User talk:GautierPoupeau

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Babel

[edit]

Babel lets you view and edit more than one language on Wikidata. Just add e.g. {{#babel:de-N|en-3|es-1|fr-2|nl-3|it-4|da-0}} to your user page. With the same language codes you can add links to your userpage on Wikipedia e.g. de:User:User123. --Tobias1984 (talk) 08:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you should transclude the request in Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot. Are you still interested in creating the bot? Otherwise I will close the request. -- Bene* talk 17:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still interested in Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/GPUBot? The Anonymouse (talk) 16:12, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, actually, I make batch modification with my personnal account (cf. My contributions) but that will be cleaner if I would use a bot account GautierPoupeau 17:16, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've transcluded the request. The Anonymouse (talk) 16:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Formatage des ISNI

[edit]

Salut ! C'est juste pour te dire que les ISNI doivent être formatés sur Wikidata avec un espace entre chaque blocs de 4 caractère comme dans "1234 1234 1234 123X". Une telle convention a été mise en place pour permettre la comparaison de deux ISNI stockés sur Wikidata juste via une comparaison de chaîne de caractères, sans avoir à se préoccuper de normalisation avant. KrBot est visiblement en train de passer derrière toi mais ce serait mieux à l'avenir d'éviter ce genre de modifs inutiles (exemple). Mais un grand merci quand même pour tout ces ajouts. Tpt (talk) 08:37, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour ! Désolé, j'avais bien vu la subtilité pour les identifiants de la BnF mais je ne l'avais pas remarqué pour les ISNI. Je modifierai mon script en conséquence pour la prochaine fois. Je suis encore débutant dans la contribution sur des projets de Wikimedia en général et Wikidata en particulier, j'étais jusqu'à maintenant plus habitué à utiliser les données qu'à en ajouter. Merci donc pour le retour et les remerciements. GautierPoupeau 10:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop the bot

[edit]

Hi GautierPoupeau. Please see my note at User talk:GPUBot. Thank you. --YMS (talk) 13:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I stop the bot GautierPoupeau (talk) 13:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) --YMS (talk) 13:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing

[edit]

Your bot has been approved. One more thing: could you please create a user page for your bot? (User:GPUBot) You can use {{Bot}}. Thanks, The Anonymouse [talk] 16:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I update the account of the bot. GautierPoupeau (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make bot-edits with your bot account? Now you are flooding recent changes with your personal account. Michiel1972 (talk) 14:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I have forgotten to change the account name in my script. I made the correction. GautierPoupeau (talk) 19:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block

[edit]

I have blocked your bot until it can be fixed. This edit was bad—the image does not exist in Commons.

Please correct your code and then feel free to request at WD:AN#User:GPUBot or at User talk:Izno for the bot to be unblocked. --Izno (talk) 20:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(copy from User talk:GPUBot--GZWDer (talk) 07:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]

series of wrong edits

[edit]

[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Please stop adding a date of death that is equal to the date of birth: This most likely indicates an error somewhere. --UV (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[7] there is a wrong website. לערי ריינהארט (talk) 01:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Identifiant Mérimée en double

[edit]

Bonjour,

Pour information, tu as ajouté une deuxième fois le même identifiant Mérimée sur Abbaye de Saint-Rambert-en-Bugey (Q2820704) (diff) ou Lyon Cathedral (Q1521) (diff).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re-bonjour,
En fait, en regardant le rapport d'erreurs Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P380, j'ai repéré quelques autres erreurs que j'ai corrigé.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour ces corrections, comme les alignements ont été faits automatiquement à partir des données de Wikimedia Commons et qu'ils n'ont pas été vérifiés avant chargement dans Wikidata, il y a effectivement des erreurs qui se sont glissées GautierPoupeau (talk) 13:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour les explications. Heureusement, les erreurs n'étaient pas si nombreuses, la correction a été assez rapide (et avec le rapport d'erreurs j'ai pu les repérer tout aussi rapidement).
Du coup, cela voudrait dire qu'il y aurait aussi des erreurs à corriger sur Commons ?
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Très certainement, je me suis "contenté" de récupérer les données existantes donc j'imagine que les erreurs viennent de là GautierPoupeau (talk) 17:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GPUBot

[edit]

If you fixed your bot, please notice that at WD:AN.--GZWDer (talk) 11:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed El-Nenny

[edit]

Hi. You seem to have added date of birth 11 July 1991 to item Q3318533. Most wikipedias have 1992. Do you have another source? Regards, --Wikijens (talk) 08:40, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GPUBot

[edit]

If you no longer run the broken code (or it is fixed), please request unblock at WD:AN. Don't do fully automatical works on your main account, otherwise it will flood Special:RecentChanges.--GZWDer (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added differents data manually and not with my bot. That's why I use my proper account. I know the rules about bot usage with main account. GautierPoupeau (talk) 05:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to run any fully automatical code again?--GZWDer (talk) 06:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know, maybe, one day but I will do it with my bot account after request unblock. GautierPoupeau (talk) 06:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that there are a large number of battles where GPUBot has added an individual date as an end date - e.g. Battle of Pollentia (Q762717), Battle of Callinicum (Q1265750), and Battle of Ad Decimum (Q1127353) In each case, end time (P582) has been used but it should be point in time (P585). It's seems to be quite widespread so it would be good to automate the fix if possible :) Regards, NavinoEvans (talk) 22:43, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GPUBot

[edit]

Salut,
Ton bot a ajouté English (Q1860) pour language of work or name (P407) sur plusieurs éléments dédiés à des publications qui sont, au moins en partie, en français (exemples : [8] [9]). Aurais-tu une idée de comment recenser les éléments concernés afin de leur ajouter French (Q150) ? Simon Villeneuve (talk) 18:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OpenRefine feedback

[edit]

Hi!

Regarding https://twitter.com/lespetitescases/status/1051486305639653376, I would be interested to know what is your experience with OpenRefine and how it could be improved.

Thanks! − Pintoch (talk) 15:23, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Our item is in another castle

[edit]

Salut Gautier,

C'est Nicolas (ex-Atos/BnF), content de te retrouver ici :-)

J'ai créé un article sur un château qui n'avait pas encore d'article, et tu lui as ajouté un identifiant Mérimée. Problème, j'ai l'impression qu'il y a une petite confusion dans la base Mérimée elle-même entre deux châteaux:

  1. Le Château du Bois de Sanzay, sujet de mon article, a un bâtiment rectangulaire qui contient une chapelle. Pas de douves (juste un plan d'eau rectangulaire) ni de châtelet d'entrée.
  2. Le Château de Sanzay a une forme d'amande/pentagone et est complètement entouré de douves. Il a un châtelet d'entrée.

Les deux châteaux sont distants de 25 kilomètres. Les deux premières pages du dossier de protection (extrait: "nombreux bâtiments disparates décrivant un plan irrégulier en amande, qui encadrent une cour plane sensiblement pentagonale", page 1) décrivent inévoquablement le second château. Au contraire, toutes les pages suivantes y compris les photographies sont relatives au premier château.

C'est grave, docteur ? Syced (talk) 12:41, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]