User talk:Ymblanter/2012-2020

Можно в двух словах?

Здравствуйте, Ярослав. Прошу помощи и совета. На рувики заметили, что проект для тех, кто хочет посмотреть вики без бюрократии. Но мне не совсем понятно куда смотреть чтобы понять что и как делать? С заглавной страницы тоэе ничего путнего не ведёт. Можете объяснить в двух словах как работать проекте? К слову, мне не чужда метапедическая деятельность и я могу заняться первичным написанием справки на руссклм языке или переводом имеющейся. Спасибо. --Zanka (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

• Добрый день. Сейчас фактически есть только одна деятельность: создание интервик. Сначала добавляете себе скрипт, как написано тут. Потом ищете поиском статью, которой пока нет. Это не очень сложно, разберётесь. Создаёте статью, пишете короткое описание, потом создаёте одну интервику, например, русскую, а потом нажимаете слева на кнопку "создать интервики" (вроде бы она есть только в английском интерфейсе, а в русском нет, интерфейс меняется сверху нажатием мыши) и автоматически импортитуете. Самое интересное тут было вчера - мне, например, удалось создать статí про стороны света, радугу, Москву, Питер, два океана и десяток стран, но сейчас такие вещи уже разобрали. Но, в общем, на нас работы хватит ещё надолго, пока созданы всего 1800 статей. Если будет что непонятно, пишите, помогу.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Скрипт добавила, страницу создала, но интервики не импортируются, во всплывающем окне выпадающий список языков пустой и при нажатии на импорт ничего не линкуется :(. Zanka (talk) 14:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

    Когда создали страницу, перезагрузите её (нажав на reload), без этого она думает, что там нет интервик. Или выйдите и зайдите, например, через список вклада.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

    Уже дошло, спасибо. А что тут статьи не линкуются друг к другу? Хотела написать в описании: "Ontario - province of Canada". Но получила квадратные скобки вместо синей ссылки. Zanka (talk) 14:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

    Нет, вроде не линкуются. Они пока обсуждают, нужны ли категории, до разметки ещё далеко. Но на самом деле описания нужны только для того, чтобы отличить одно Онтарио от другого (например, озеро, которое я вчера создал, от провинции), так что без разметки вполне можно обойтись.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

    Что-то всё равно нужно, категории или списки, пусть и координационные. Как-то же нужно понимать что создано, а что ещё нет. Блин, за пару минут пара статей, весело получается. :) Хотелось бы понять такой вопрос: идея была - вовремя обновлять данные. Скажем я здесь пишу "Премьер-министр Канады. Текущий премьер - Стивен Харпер." И как только он меняется, я его меняю здесь и он автоматически сменяется во всех статьях по интервикам. Такое ещё не реализовано? Zanka (talk) 14:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

    Нет, это будет на каком-то из следующих этапов. Пока только интервики. Что до координации, в принципе, можно сделать Task Force (в категории Category:Task force их сейчас три) и обьявить на общем форуме. Но по провинциям Канады смысла нет - их быстрее создать, чем писать список. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

    Это понятно, просто любопытно было. Спасибо, постараюсь не сильно вам мешать глупыми вопросами :). Zanka (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

    Да нет, чего же в них глупого, нормальные вопросы. Надо будет, не стасняйтесь, спрашивайте.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Тогда я ещё спрошу. Есть ли какое-нибудь соглашене как писать уточнения для многозначных слов (в основном названий городов)? Zanka (talk) 14:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Что Вы называете уточнениями? Метку (label) или описание?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Метку. Я так понимаю не может быть двух одинаковых меток. Или может? То же озеро и провинция Онтарио, как лучше? Zanka (talk) 14:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Могут, и для того и нужно описание, чтобы их различать. Я стараюсь сразу ставить метку подлиннее, чтобы уже в поиске было видно, но не все и не всегда так будут делать, так что важно, чтобы описание было достаточным для идентификации.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

• Да, ещё можно добавлять в статьи названия и описания на русском, их по большей части нет.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Ярослав! Пытался создать для пробы страницу, руководствуясь данной дискуссией и общей инструкцией, но с интервиками ничего не выходит. Можете объяснить, что я не так сделал? - A.Savin (talk) 23:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

• Есть подозрение что работа на разных языках ещё не отлажена. Судя по вашей истории правок, возможно вы создаёте метку в версии на русском языке. Попробуйте найти в самом верху страницы справа два значка, а потом надпись "English". Нажмите на неё. По меньшей мере скрипт работает только в английской версии. Zanka (talk) 23:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
• Ага, проверила. После двух значков у вас или "English", или "русский". Чтобы пользоваться скриптом нужно поставить английский. Я перевела свою настройку на русский и увидела ваш текст, то есть у вас сейчас настройка русская. Zanka (talk) 23:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
• По всей видимости, User:Zanka права, надо переключиться (сверху) на английский интерфейс. Плюс поздним вечером у меня скрипт отказывался работать, говорил, что все интервики уже стоят. Утром ещё не проверял.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

  Баг исправили (было не у меня одного), скрипт заработал.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Дык на английский интерфейс я ещё вчера переключил, следуя вашему совету на чате. Сейчас ещё раз зашёл на страницу, кэш давно очищен, но в тулбоксе ничего про интервики до сих пор не вижу. - A.Savin (talk) 09:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Может, у Вас скрипт как-то не так установлен, или не туда? Не должно такого быть. Правда,, недавно на чате в той же теме один из участников жаловался, что он тоже ничего не видит, хотя ещё утром скрипт работал.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Да, Ваша страница у меня показывается как совершенно пустая, не знаю почему. Я добавил минимум информации (из Ваших же правок), посмотрите, работает ли сейчас.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Вспомнил, ещё сообщали, что в некоторых версиях IE скрипт не работает. У Вас не Эксплорер?--Ymblanter (talk) 10:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Firefox. Ладно, будем ждать-с, пока детские болячки не вылечат. - A.Savin (talk) 11:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Тот пользователь, о котором я говорил, написал, что он проапгрейдил FF до новой версии, и всё заработало. У Вас слева в меню "import interwiki" вообще ни в каких статьях не виден? Он должен быть виден везде, кроме, возможно, пустых.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Нажал случайную статью, то же самое. Насчёт апгрейда подумаю - A.Savin (talk) 11:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

• А у меня так и не работает :( Вчера не работал скрипт, а сегодня совсем пропал. Вроде уже и кэш почистила. Zanka (talk) 12:04, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

  Видимо, это какие-то масштабные проблемы, которые проявляются только в определённых браузерах. Попробуйте напрямую спросить у автора скрипта. У меня с утра как заработало, так и всё в порядке.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Форум

Кстати, я сделала русскую версию Wikidata:Project chat/ru. Приглядывайте, постараюст дать на неё ссылки с других страниц, которые переводила вчера и буду переводить сегодня. Zanka (talk) 12:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

• Я ещё вечером поставил в список наблюдения. На неё, наверное, надо дать ссылку в русской Википедии, большинство юзеров приходит именно оттуда. С некоторыми, правда, у меня нет ни малейшего желания разговаривать ни на каком языке, но, с другой стороны, меня никто и не заставляет.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Ярослав, просьба к Вам, как к единственному русскоязычному администратору, заглядывать на эту страницу. Насколько я понимаю, там уже сейчас иногда возникают вопросы, на которые Вы сможете более квалифицированно ответить. --Michgrig (talk) 18:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

    Я с января прекратил во всех проектах Фонда действия, выгода от которых идёт главным образом русской Википедии. В частности, это переводы и участие в русскоязычных форумах, кроме Викигида. На любые вопросы я буду рад ответить тут — кроме весьма ограниченного круга участников русской Википедии, которых я считаю подонками. Их очень немного, и, подозреваю, о моём к ним отношении они догадываются.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

    • ОК. Мне очень жаль, что мои соотечественники/носители того же языка нанесли вам и всей рувики такой ущерб. --Michgrig (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

      Ну, что мне в одну сторону, а соотечественникам в другую, было ясно уже много лет, и пока события вполне логично развиваются в одном и том же направлении. Так что уж извините. На обращения на моей странице, как видите, я реагирую.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Конфликт интервик

Добрый день, Ярослав! Тут наткнулся на мощный конфликт интервик, даже не знаю, что делать. Речь идёт о терминах "День" (статья уже есть) и "Сутки" (создать не удалось), там почти половина интервик пересекаются. --Art-top (talk) 09:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

• Боюсь, только разбирать руками (если это физически возможно, например, попросив ботовода), или оставить как есть.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Можно попробовать в рувики указать на конфликт интервики (там где-то есть форум по этому поводу с неплохими специалистами). Если там помогут, уже потом здесь разбирать завалы. Можно и здесь про конфликт сказать (Wikidata:Report interwiki conflicts), но его пока как бы нет здесь. Zanka (talk) 12:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
    • Вроде сложилось: Сутки, День. --Art-top (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
      • А мне кажется, для дня en:Daylight неверно, должно быть en:Daytime (astronomy). Infovarius (talk) 18:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

patrol right

Hi,

Do you have the patrol right now that it has been added to the autopatrolled group, or do I need to add you to that group?

Best regards — Arkanosis ^✉ 23:00, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

• I do not know, but I do not see pages marked as not patrolled in my watchlist, nor in the new pages list, and I randomly tried several and I do not see the paroller interface. So it is probably best to add me to the group. Thanks in advance.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:35, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

   Done Best regards — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:28, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

  Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Федеративное устройство России

Вы на форуме сказали, что всё сделали. Вы случайно не отмечали нигде номера. Пригодились бы, чтобы заполнить Wikidata:Country subdivision task force (Россия в Азии :) ). --Zanka (talk) 18:10, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Нет, надо просто их туда скопировать и руками заполнить. У меня, к сожалению, сейчас очень плохо со временем, а ещё реки висят, попробую сделать на выходные.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Ок. Я постараюсь сделать. --Zanka (talk) 20:58, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Собственно, я начал, но сегодня больше не успею, а завтра раньше полудня вряд ли вообще увижу компьютер.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Jerusalem

Hi Ymblanter, descriptions are not sentences, see Help:Description. your sentence "City in Israel which Israel claims to be its capital" is not description. Please do not enter your political agenda here. The description should be the same as Washington, D.C. Thanks Hanay (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

It is incorrect to write that Jerusalem is the capital in Israel since most countries do not recognize this. I created this item, and I wrote "City in Israel" which is neutral, but someone decided to involve politics and write it is a capital. Then I had to make the statement more precise.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Oh,I see, that were you who brought the politics in. I reverted the changes to the "city in Israel", it is clearly neutral.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

To write on Jerusalem a city in Israel is political agenda. I checked also Paris and Berlin and I saw that there are also description that say capital of... according to you Israel has no capital city. Hanay (talk) 19:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

According to UNO the capital of Israel is Tel Aviv. Why do not you take the question to the village pump?--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

who decide what is the capital, the country or the UNO? -- yona b (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Please do not bring here Israel-Arab discussions, I am really not interested in having them. Would you please as I suggested open the topic at the Project Chat? It is really a contentious issue, much discussed in Wikipedia, and obviously all arguments like the last one have their counterarguments.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata:Project chat#Talk 1218--Ymblanter (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

i just ask a general question "who decide about capital". if the ansert is UNO so it will be tel aviv and if the ansert is the country so jerusalem, of course source need for each case. beleave me, i don't want the Israel-Arab discussions more then you. -- yona b (talk) 16:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

My personal opinion is that since we do not have enough space for discussing the issue in detail, we should bring the UN definition (similar to, for instance, how we define Kosovo or Abkhazia as territories, not countries). However, this is just my opinion, I hope at the Project Chat we will hear more opinions. Some contentious issues must have been raised here before.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Uppercase or lowercase

Hi. :) I see you reverted me at Property:P20 re the capitalization. I figured it'd be best to just keep the labels consistent with item policy for the time being. Your thoughts? — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:11, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Actually, I have not even seen that I reverted you. I noticed that some properties were created which were capitalized and also capitalized this one, thinking it is an exception. I do not have hard feelings, though I do think it would be nice to have them all either capitalized or not capitalized (I am talking now about English). The quieries are all capitalized. Please feel free to revert me if you think it is more appropriate.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Likewise, I don't feel too strongly either way, but lowercase seems more appropriate for the time being. I said on IRC "I'm gonna lowercase them all if no one objects", and no one did, so I figure this is a good working consensus until we can flesh out some policies. Plus we only have like 15 properties right now, so better sooner than later. Anyways, thanks for being so helpful with this! We on Wikidata should go lord over enwp the fact that we can actually have a brief disagreement without any incivility occuring. ;) — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:20, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Since Snipre (talk • contribs • logs) reverted me too (presumably unaware of past discussion), I've proposed this to settle the matter for the time being. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Азия

Ярослав, доброе утро. Посмотрите, пожалуйста, в некоторых статьях вместо континента Азия указана британская рок-группа с таким же названием. --Art-top (talk) 03:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Да, такое может быть, там неудачный интерфейс при выборе названия. Спасибо, сейчас посмотрю.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Все поменял.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо! --Art-top (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

• Ярослав, мне тяжело читать и участвовать в дискуссиях на английском, не могли бы вы обратить внимание сообщества на невозможность выбора некоторых элементов из-за короткого списка элементов. Например, мне не удалось добавить Париж как место смерти (использовал русский язык), поскольку страницы, отвечающей за столицу Франции в списке просто не было, а по номеру добавление невозможно. --Art-top (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

  Это известный баг (причём конкретно с Парижем), обсуждается со вчерашнего вечера. Известное решение - искать не по названию, а по синониму, при этом если не находится ни по одному имеющемуся синониму (я по-русски не пробовал), ввести новый, а потом стереть. Но, думаю, в пределах дня будет какое-то нормальное решение.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

прошу объединить

Здравствуйте. Обнаружил здесь два элемента на одну и ту же тему: Q4294076 и Q1164590. Если можно, объедините их, пожалуйста. --A.Savin (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо, сейчас сделаю.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

quasi-RFC on geographic hierarchy properties

You began a quasi-RFC on which properties to use for administrative divisions to indicate their location. Since the discussion has lasted over a week, and had its last comment two days ago, do you think it should be "closed" and a final "verdict" announced? -- Ypnypn (talk) 01:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, indeed, I was waiting till there should be two days without activity. It definitely can be closed, but since I initiated it, I am reluctant to close it myself, and I would prefer somebody else to do it.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Provinces of the Netherlands

Hi, please check the map of the Netherlands before you change what provinces border each province. Thanks. Thayts (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: welcoming

Thank you for the welcome! --Cekli829 (talk) 08:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• На здоровье--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcoming/Problem

Hey, thanks for welcoming. I just made a mistake due to problems using the search engine. I created the Object Q4995799 but there was already an Object I didn't found before. I can't find a way to delete the Q4995799 so maybe you can help me. Thanks --Pixelfire (talk) 17:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• I will take care of this, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Now I've just found the Delete Request tool ;). I'ts a little bit tricky to work with this new wiki. --Pixelfire (talk) 17:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

    You are welcome. Do not hesitate to ask more questions if needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Just a bit of housekeeping

[1] Isn't Nyttend already autoconfirmed? — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 15:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

I also thought so, but since there was a case to tick, I decided to tick it. From my former admin experience, one can not give a flag to someone who is already autoconfirmed, but may be Wikidata is different.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

As I understand it, it's technically possible to grant an autoconfirmed user confirmed rights, but there's no reason to. Currently WD:Confirmed users says that you shouldn't, and no one's objected so far. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 16:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I removed it, thanks for noticing.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Об административном делении и о ПО

Приветствую! Как вы думаете насколько корректно переносить указание муниципальной единицы на место административного деления [2] [3] [4] [5]? Тут всё стало происходить так стремительно. Недавно снесли страницу "правовое государство" для объединения в одну кучу с "верховенством права", хотя даже в англовики это всегда были две разные статьи. Теперь - тема ПО, где в одну кучу были свалены 4 разные темы интервик - и открытое, и свободное, и ПО, и Creative Commons. Я их раньше начал разгребать: статьи, в которых чёрным по белому написано (как казалось) "открытое ПО", - отдельно; СПО - отдельно; статей, где сказано и о GPL, и о CC (то есть об идее свободных лицензий как таковых) оказалось всего лишь 4 - ru, uk, en, fr. Наверное, лучше было бы попросить распределить эти ссылки и удалить эту замусоренную страницу, а в итоге всё обратно вернули на эту свалку - а там остались статьи не про CC и hardware, а про ПО - то ли свободное, то ли открытое... Вы не могли бы, когда будет время, спросить с какой целью не решили межъязыковой конфликт, а наоборот его снова создали? Я не успел и глазом моргнуть.)) --TarzanASG (talk) 03:38, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

С административным делением было очень длительное обсуждение, которое я когда-то организовал, пришли пока к этому варианту - то есть все свойства пока деактивировать, использовать единственное located in the administrative area. Возможно, при дальнейшем развитии проекта найдётся место и для специализированных свойст, но пока так. С ПО, честно говоря, я не очень понял, проще всего вынести на общий форум (Project chat) и посмотреть, что скажут.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

В том-то и дело, что я не знаю как объяснить и не помню как всё было на той удалённой странице. --TarzanASG (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Я попробую посмотреть удалённый вклад, если что-то пойму, напишу.--Ymblanter (talk) 02:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Вы ещё не заглянули? Я попробую по-другому ещё объяснить. Как я понимаю, сама структура Викиданных предпологает, чтобы в страничка и её интервики были о чём-то конкретном. Нельзя на одной странице смешивать интервики о человеке, географическом объекте и неоднозначности. Если сейчас зайти на Q196294 и попытаться добавить какие-то факты, то невозможно определить какие именно надо добавлять. Ну вот хоть перечислить примеры лицензий. Английская интервика вообще обо всех лицензиях, значит, мы можем написать CC как пример, но тогда придётся немедленно удалить арабскую, индонезийскую, малайскую, японскую и корейскую интервики, потому что, как я понял через Google Translate, эти статьи исключительно о лицензиях СПО. А венгерская интервика - строго о лицензиях открытого ПО. Таким образом сейчас смешано в одной куче три разных понятия: Open source license, Free software license, Free license - всё это здесь в одной куче. По идее надо удалить лишние интервики и оставить только те интервики, которые реально связаны друг с другом. Так ведь? Но именно эту операцию я уже проделал на странице Q3941714, которую удалили. На самом деле надо было удалить именно Q196294, но перед этим нужно попросить, чтобы сами носители языка вручную расформировали те неправильные интервики (я эту работу не доделал). Я даже не представляю как мне это всё объяснить англоязычным коллегам.)) --TarzanASG (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

На момент удаления в статье были английская, французская, русская и украинская интервики. Все они сейчас лежат в Q196294. Честно говоря, я всё ещё не вижу никаких проблем с этим объединением, но если Вы видите, попробуйте поднять тему на общем форуме.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

В том-то и дело, что эти 4 интервики по другой теме, чем все остальные в Q196294. Тему я поднять не могу. --TarzanASG (talk) 23:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Your protection

• Q4395506

Hello. I originally intended 2 weeks given the spamming by spambots, but apparently you conflicted and made it just 1. Would you be willing to modify your protection to 2 weeks?--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

I already reacted on request to administratiors. Would be fine with me. I have not seen the original protections, they did not yet exist when I was reviewing the edit history.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:05, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Well, if I just reverted to my original setting, that would be wheel warring.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Let us decide on smth on the Requests page (there are three parties involved), and then take action.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Gadget-enumItems.js

Please update the translation into Russian in MediaWiki:Gadget-enumItems.js. --Vivaelcelta (talk) 01:17, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

• Sorry, this is an activity where I understand next to nothing. May be if there are detailed instructions I would be able to accomplish it.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

P208 и P209

Ярослав, посмотрите, пожалуйста, Property:P208 и Property:P209. У них не введено название, что это? -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 10:32, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

По-видимому, какай-то ошибка. Оба созданы сегодня, дадим автору немного времени, если ничего не появится, я удалю.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Они используются в нескольких статьях. -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 10:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

А в истории - какое-то название на иврите. -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 10:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Отнёс сюда, там разберутся.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

А как эти properties создаются? Например, для персоналий важны дата рождения и смерти, а этих properties нет, как их добавить? -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 10:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Надо добавлять через Wikidata:Property proposal‎ (только посмотрите архивы, там по персоналиям, по-моему, уже всё перепробовали). С 208 и 209 посмотрю, что там можно сделать. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Даты, по-моему, пока не умеют кодировать, обещали позже.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

How to edit

How to edit this wiki? I can't edit! Please answer something about my question. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 10:53, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

I replied on the Project Chat.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Ymblanter. You have new messages at Wikidata:Project chat.
Message added --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 11:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Герасимова-Персидська

Please rename the page Q6487634 to Herasymova-Persydska as it might be in English according to w:en:Wikipedia:Romanization of Ukrainian A1 (talk) 09:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

• No problem. You could have also done it yourself, this is not an admin task.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks --A1 (talk) 09:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Q6523403

Why have you deleted this item? --Kolega2357 (talk) 10:10, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

• We do not keep items for user pages on Wikidata.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Will it be in the future? --Kolega2357 (talk) 10:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

• This is a community decision. You can try to take it for discussion and change it.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Q6527076

Delete this item please wrong opened. Greeting! --Kolega2357 (talk) 10:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Done, no problem--Ymblanter (talk) 10:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Q6527430

Delete this please, and I mistakenly opened. Adding interwiki for articles that bots are never added. Once again I'm sorry if I'm boring. Greeting! --Kolega2357 (talk) 10:49, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

• Someone already deleted it.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Вандализм?

Ярослав, посмотрите, пожалуйста, вклад участника MHamlet. Он занимается чистым удалением информации, например: [6], [7]. --Art-top (talk) 11:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

• Спасибо, написал ему, посмотрим, что скажет.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

• Большое спасибо! --Art-top (talk) 05:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

ElphiBot

Hi Ymblanter. Could you please see this request. Thanks in advance----عباس ☢ 21:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

I saw it, but you only filed it yesterday. I would normally expect at least three days for discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Ok. thanks. In hope to see you tomorrow there.--عباس ☢ 21:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

прошу объединить (2)

Добрый вечер. Вот ещё два элемента об одном и том же: Q2715389 и Q151731. Вообще, странный какой-то проект: здесь что, в каждом подобном случае нужно клянчить у админов, чтобы удалили лишнюю страницу? --A.Savin (talk) 18:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

• Сейчас сделаю. Пустые страницы, да, надо удалять, но это примерно так же просто, как на Викискладе и делается одним нажатием кнопки. Никакое "сопровождение" тут не требуется, выставили на удаление и забыли.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

  Мерси. Нажимаемой один раз кнопки у меня нет, так что буду в случае чего к вам обращаться. --A.Savin (talk) 19:17, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

  Да, без проблем.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Just a Thank you message. Merci

Thank you Ymblanter. It is always nice to be greeted with some warm words. Looking forward to help Wikidata with my modest contribution :-) Merci pour votre message de bienvenue. J'essayerais d'aider et de contribuer à Wikidata. :-) Ludopedia (talk) 13:16, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

mistake

[8] sorry, I think I roollback mistake in mobile. Can you restore it?-- DangSunM (T · C) 11:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

No problem, already done.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

closing a request

Hello. Would you please approve my request?--Avocato (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

• I would like to have an explicit reaction from Legoktm. Could you please may be discuss with them? If they are fine with the request, I will post a 24h notice.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Personally, I have nothing to say; since the code maker, user:Reza1615, has answered him. Can't you approve the request for now?! it's opened for more than 3 days.--Avocato (talk) 15:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

No, there was no reaction to the reply. Let me put a 24h notice now and see what happens.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Ok, no problems.--Avocato (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

It's time now! :)--Avocato (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

It is still 40 minutes. Do not worry.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Объединение элементов

Добрый день, Ярослав! Объедините, пожалуйста: Q4767002 и Q2850583. Спасибо, Sealle (talk) 04:33, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

• Сделал.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:32, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Shuaib-bot

Hi Ymblanter. Would you see please this request, Thanks :) Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Put a 24h notice.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks :) Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 16:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Kindly approve my bot, Thanks. Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 15:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 16:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lottt! :) Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 16:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

But still my bot's contribs appear in recent changes, why? Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 17:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

I applied to stewards, but probably they did not yet react. You may want to wait for a couple of hours, until one of the stewards grants your bot a flag.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

OK, I stopped my bot. :) Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Баг и вопрос

Здравствуйте. Вот такой вот баг: [9]. Там рекомендация писать админам, хотя и неясно чем они помогут... Тут бы лучше что-то типа техфорума.

Вопрос: смотрю уже много админов, русскоязычных же более не видать, полагаю, мог бы вписаться в проект как техник. Собственно вопрос: каковы требования к админам и голосующим и станут ли избирать участника, имеющего лишь локальный опыт? Мастер теней (talk) 20:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Я вижу Вами созданный объект, но ссылка для меня никуда не ведёт, поэтому, соответственно, я не понимаю, в чём проблема. Если Вы мне объясните, возможно, я смогу с ней справиться. В принципе, Project Chat сейчас функционирует как все форумы сразу, можно и туда писать.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

[10]: нажимаю ссылку "пред.", затем "Следующая правка →". На любой из правок истории вылезает сей глюк. Мастер теней (talk) 19:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Так какой глюк-то? У меня ссылка ведёт на историю страницу, там вроде никаких проблем нет, показывает, что надо.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

[11]: попробуйте нажать "Следующая правка →". Мастер теней (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Ага, теперь вижу. Сейчас отнесу на форум, если ничего не скажут, разработчикам.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Спросил, говорят, известный баг.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:21, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Ясно, будем ждать починки. Мастер теней (talk) 13:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Касательно заявок на статус администратора, хотя этого формально нет в правилах, сейчас требуется опыт участия в Викиданных. Обычно двух недель очень интенсивного участия либо месяца просто интенсивного за глаза должно хватить. Только, если надумаете подавать, ни в коем случае не давайте объявлений об этом ни в русской Википедии, ни на местном русскоязычном форуме. Если такое объявление найдут, большинство голосовавших за сменят свои голоса, такое у нас несколько раз было. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо, учту. Аналога нашему объявлению на форуме новостей, я так понял, нет вовсе? Мастер теней (talk) 19:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Нет, никто этого не делает, следят за общей страницей.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Да, и для импорта интервик есть очень удобный гаджет, надо включить: slurpInterwiki--Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Во всю пользую , удобно. Странно, что он по умолчанию у всех не включён. Мастер теней (talk) 19:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Shuaib-bot

Hello. Re the request linked above, I raised a concern before you closed it, and it hadn't actually been resolved. Please ensure the concerns are fully resolved before closing requests. I'll continue the discussion re the issue on the operator's user talk page. — Hazard-SJ  ✈  02:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry for that, I had the impression that the bot owner answer was fine (I have seen similar situations in the past, and I know that in some cases users who had initial objections do not always confirm they were satisfied). Thank you for taking this up.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I understand. Usually I wait a bit to see if the objector has anything else to add, just to play it safe. In the future, though, please either look into ensuring the issue was resolved or seek more explanation if the issue raised is unclear to you. Usually I'd also wait a bit after such confirmation just to ensure there are no more issues. — Hazard-SJ  ✈  15:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Q1126617

Добрый день. Посмотрите, пожалуйста, голландскую статью здесь ↑, непонятно, куда её лучше отправить, сюда или в Q2046187.Longbowman (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Перенёс во вторую, там уместнее. Спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

{{User talk unfragmentation}}

I created it to standardize all similar notices on talk pages. Feel free to improve/use it. --Ricordisamoa 14:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I am in principle fine, but are you sure defragmentation unfragmentation is a proper English word for this situation? It would be probably good to either show this to a native English speaker, or to remove the first line.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:35, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Stryn has "unfragmented". --Ricordisamoa 15:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, my typo. But he is also not a native speaker. User:Legoktm or User:Ajraddatz?--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I've asked Legoktm: let's see. --Ricordisamoa 15:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm behind on my talk page. "unfragmentation" makes sense to me, though it does seem a bit awkward. I don't have any better ideas though... Legoktm (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Good, let us then keep it like this. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Прописаная буква в описаниях

При беглом просмотре случайных статей выяснилось, что общего стиля в описаниях элементов не наблюдается — есть описания, начинающиеся как с прописной, так и со строчной буквы. На странице про описания на английском языке рекомендуется не делать первую букву прописной. Существует ли какое-либо обсуждение и коненсус по этому поводу? Если нет, я добавлю соответствующую тему на странице обсуждения описаний элементов на русском языке. Enzet (talk) 18:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

На английском было обсуждение, хотя не уверен, что его легко найти, оно должно было быть на общем форуме в ноябре, надо по архивам смотреть. Тогда же решили, что в описании не нужны артикли. Относительно русских описаний такого обсуждения не было.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

В общем, если есть возможность (в отличие от Википедии) разделить первую букву на строчную/прописную - почему бы это не делать? Сейчас большинство начинается с прописной, т.к. были импортированы из Википедии, но я постепенно исправляю, где натыкаюсь. --Infovarius (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Я знаю, что голландские описания собирались исправлять ботом (он, правда, пока не одобрен), может быть, как-то можно и русские так же исправить - выделить какие-то классы описаний, где в начала не может быть заглавной. В русском это даже проще, так как прилагательные, образованные от географических названий, пишутся с маленькой буквы.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Создал здесь обсуждение. Приглашаю присоединиться. Считаю, очень важно прийти к консенсусу и сообщить об этом в правилах. Иначе придётся исправлять ботами, а полностью автоматически это сделать невозможно. Enzet (talk) 08:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Создал аналогичное обсуждение для меток. Пожалуйста, посмотрите. Enzet (talk) 18:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Help:Merge

Ярослав, можно вас попросить подготовить эту страницу к переводу? Я так понимаю, что там нужно как-то разбить текст для перевода плюс добавить шаблон со ссылками на другие языки. Или по этому вопросу надо обращаться к кому-то еще? --Michgrig (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Там надо шаблон повесить, вроде у меня на это должно быть достаточно прав. Сейчас посмотрю.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Нет, к сожалению, не могу, надо просить кого-то с флагом Translation administrators.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Насколько я вижу, для каждой страницы свой шаблон. То, что вы добавили, относится к странице Help:Label --Michgrig (talk) 13:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Да, Вы правы, убрал.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:27, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

items?

I wanted to create Der Wald and U-Bahn Kontrollöre in tiefgefrorenen Frauenkleidern (after I did ot find them), - I could enter en but not de. ??? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Let us start from the second one. The German one exists, Q2465664. the English one is here. I will merge them in a moment. The problem was that the name you were using for the German article is a redirect, this is why you could not find the article by "item by sitelink" tool. Will be back soon for the first one.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

For the first one, I see the English link here and the German one here. I am not exactly sure what the problem was, since both are direct links, but anyway I will fix it now.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:44, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for #2, - the other one is not yet connected, right. - It would be nice if the search function delivered the titles, too much "Wald", --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:56, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

No problem. The other one is connected as well, you just need to purge the cache. The search is currently disfunctional, but next week it should be considerably improved, I already tried the new version.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Copying labels and descriptions in other languages when merging

Hello, Ymblanter! I see that you have finalized my RfD about Q1566978 and in this process you also added a label in German language on Q1979505. I guess that this label was present in Q1566978, but I did not see it, because my language preference is set to English. How should a user properly copy all labels and descriptions in other languages when merging two items? Rsocol (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

My language preference is English as well. You see the labels in main languages (de, es, fr, it, nl, ru) on any item, and usually it is considered to be a good style to copy at least them to the new item (two-click operation) but it is in no way required of course. Another thing which I usually do is when I see that an item has an interlanguage link to one of these languages but the item name is missing I add it when possible. Please ask me if you need further clarification.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

The languages in which one sees labels and descriptions are the languages he/she sets on his/her user page by using the #babel template. --Michgrig (talk) 13:41, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Then I got it completely wrong. But I believe there was a script which makes all or some languages visible.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:46, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, both for the tips: I added #babel on my user page and I also enabled the LabelLister gadget (which adds a new tab where I can see the labels defined in any language). Maybe a mention about these tools should be added in the Help:Merge page, so the users can find out how to properly merge the items (until a merge tool is developed). Rsocol (talk) 15:36, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Вопрос про раздел Википедии с индексом ki

В выпадающем списке кодов разделов Википедии не хватает кода ki. Можете ли Вы его туда добавить? Hhhggg (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Не добавляются страницы из некторых разделов

И ещё одна проблема - почему-то не добавляются страницы из разделов nv, ny, oc, om, os, or, pag, pam, pap, pa, pdc, pcd, pfl, pih, pi:

Произошла ошибка при попытке выполнить сохранение, поэтому ваши изменения не могут быть завершены.

Подробности Revision not found: 14947950

. Hhhggg (talk) 14:29, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

О каком списке Вы говорите? На какой странице он отображается? Касательно второго вопроса, может быть миллион разных причин, без примера, боюсь, не разобраться.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Выпадающий список, о котором я говорю - это выпадающий список с кодами разделов Википедии, который появляется на странице викиданных при нажатии кнопки "Добавить". Hhhggg (talk) 14:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Проверил папьяменту (pap) - у меня появляется. Может, Вы не до конца прокручиваете? Если набрать pap - что происходит? Поле остаются пустым?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Да, pap появляется. Видимо, я Вас запутал, начав обсуждать сразу две проблемы в одной секции страницы обсуждения. То, что ki не появляется, это одна проблема, а то, что страницы из pap не добавляются - это другая проблема. Конкретный пример второй проблемы - это моя личная страницы в pap - попробуйте её добавить сюда, и Вы увидите то сообщение об ошибке, которое я процитировал. Hhhggg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

А, теперь понял в чём было дело - Bill william compton удалил страницу Q8231517, куда я пытался добавить страницу из pap, поэтому и появлялось такое сообщение. Но тогда возникает вопрос о том, почему он её удалил - разве для личных страниц перенос интервик в Викиданные не предусмотрен? Hhhggg (talk) 15:20, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Нет, личные страницы, согласно консенсусу сообщества, в Викиданные не переносят. Код ki ещё актуален, надо смотреть?--Ymblanter (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Код ki уже появился. А насчёт того, что интервики из личных страниц не переносятся сюда - это весьма странное решение - мне кажется, это было бы очень удобно. Надеюсь, со временем это решение будет пересмотрено. Hhhggg (talk) 06:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata talk:Notability#Why is it forbidden to connect user pages with Wikidata?--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Q2065736

Kan je hier eens naar kijken? Klopt volgens mij iets niet. Multichill (talk) 20:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Het engelse en het oekrainse artikelen gaan over culturele monumenten in het algemeen; het russische en het franse artikelen praten over culturele monumenten van Rusland, dus is er volgens mij verstandig twee verschillende items te hebben. Ik heb de franse beschrijving aangepast. Het verbaast mij dat wij pas in twee talen algemene artikelen over culturele monumenten hebben; er moeten nog zeker andere ergens verborgen zijn.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Ik heb nu de tweede aangemaakt: Q8346700.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Dank je! Multichill (talk) 21:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Inderdaad: Q358 is een algemeen eigenschap, dus ik heb Q2065736 verwijderd.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Somehow the deletion left a lot of debris Special:WhatLinksHere/Q2065736 (1300 red links).

Further, as the two notions aren't identical, I'm not sure if adding an interwiki link "en:cultural property" to an item called "heritage site" (more specific), is a good idea. --  Docu  at 17:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Actually, another editor (not Maarten and not me) moved there the English link. Let me restore the item with the English and the Ukrainian links, and then we can slowly sort out what needs to be done.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

In terms of interwiki collections, I suppose we should be having two. In terms of items to be used for properties, a single one would be preferable.

BTW, thanks for creating Q8346700, when cleaning up Q2065736 I omitted this. --  Docu  at 18:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I just discover this diskussion. I didn't expect that changing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_property to Q358 could make any trouble. For in this article you can find File:Kulturdenkmal_4_Sprachen.jpg showing an official translation en/de. --Brühl (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I guess you don't edit with the English language interface. Currently the label of item Q358 reads "heritage site" and you added an interwiki to en:cultural property instead of en:heritage site.

BTW there is also Q889487 (also labeled "heritage site"). --  Docu  at 18:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I am happy to host this discussion at my talk page, but it may haver some interest for users who do not yet have my talk page in their watchlists. Should we may be move to some other place, like Project Chat or Interwiki Conflicts?--Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Peace to your talk page. I sorted out some of the links and left a note on Talk:Q2065736. One might want to continue there. --  Docu  at 21:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Q8546736

How is this possible? Is the user must be at Wikidata? --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Per WD:Notability, I have deleted the item.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Moved

in Q1880598, both articles were moved to lower case "a" in "arpa", what needs to be done here? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Ideally, all links and all labels had to be updated. Infovarius has already done this, I have just now corrected the remaining (French) label. Thanks for noticing.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your welcome

Спасибо Вам за прием! J.M.Domingo (talk) 20:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Bot approval

You can take a look at my request? I waited seven days and no opposition. Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Bot#KLBot2_3 --Kizar (talk) 19:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

I put a 24h notice.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

No further objections. --Kizar (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Actually, I already approved it.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

hi

Don't know what I'm doing, but trying to remove on WP from two others, as the topics are completely different. Since there is no page name to tell me where I am, I think I just ended up deleting all of them. (Romanova family name on WP-de vs. Romanova language on -nl and -eo.) I'll just stick them back in manually and let a bot handle it. (BTW, I won't get a message here, but will at WP-en.) Kwamikagami (talk) 19:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

When you are done, please let me know, I can have a look.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

EdinBot - bot flag approval

Hi Ymblanter! I have put a request for a bot flag for EdinBot and there were no objections in the past three days. Could you please review this? Thanks in advance. -- Edinwiki (talk) 10:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

For me, one vote is not sufficient, we need to wait for more votes from experienced users. I am sorry for this, recently indeed many bot requests do not fly as fast as they should due to insufficient attention, but there is very little we can do about this. Let us just wait until there are more comments.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Another reason that I sent you this message is because I saw multiple replies on bot requests that were requested after mine. I guess I assumed implicitly that they didn't object my request and therefore that it was seen as "ok". Anyway, I hope to see more support because like I said, I want to do much more than the current proposal. This bot flag would make life much easier. :) -- Edinwiki (talk) 12:29, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Wrong edition.

Hi. Sorry, but this is wrong edition: http://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q428407&diff=26361502&oldid=25997969 Correct link is: pl:Struktura organizacyjna Świadków Jehowy. Not Kongres. --Wiklol (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

• I swapped them, thanks for pointing out.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/FischBot 2

Hi! There was an editing conflict. I kindly ask you to pay attention to my addition. The bot owner never answered the questions to precise problems. I am active on de.wikipedia.org for 9 years and know the obstacles of using this data. Pyfisch is a very young (14) and unexperienced (started in january 2013) user on de.wikipedia.org. We need more time and more answers. I kindly urge you to revoke your decision for now. Thank you. --Polarlys (talk) 10:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I will do it but please discuss at the RfP page.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I see, you have brought them there already. Nothing for me to do at this point.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. --Polarlys (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Q11836865

Hello, as discussed in Property talk:P92, P92 seems a bit ambiguous, so I started to replace it with P:P48P:P248 and P:P457. In doing so, I noticed that we needed Q11836865, but I could not find any doc in a language that I understand, so just wondering: is Q11836865 a Q4426221 ? --Zolo (talk) 13:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

No, it is not. Q4426221 is the upper house of the parliament of the Soviet Union; Q11836865 (it is available at Wikisource in Russian, s:ru:Декларация Совета Республик ВС СССР от 26.12.1991 № 142-Н, is the declaration of this body which states that the Soviet Union is dissolved.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:12, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok, so if I guess right: "Декларация Совета Республик ВС СССР от 26.12.1991 № 142-Н" is an instance of "Декларации Совета Республик Верховного Совета СССР" (no item yet, I think), the author of "Декларации Совета Республик Верховного Совета СССР" is "Совет Республик Верховного Совета СССР", "Совет Республик Верховного Совета СССР" is the successor of "Совет Национальностей Верховного Совета СССР" and "Совет Национальностей Верховного Совета СССР" =en:Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union ? --Zolo (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, absolutely correct.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok thanks. Or rather just the successor of en:Soviet of Nationalities, no ? I have added some statements to the items. --Zolo (talk) 17:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Q2223715

Hi, you were deleted Q2223715 as merged with, but w:vi:Thì hiện tại hoàn thành has not linked anywhere. --Stryn (talk) 19:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for finding this out. Indeed, I see how I made the mistake, and I now added the Vietnamese link to Q11045170 (this is the same item the English link went), but then we seem to have a problem with it:Passato prossimo, which I guess should be in the same item but is instead in Q1417024. I guess I will take it to the Interwiki conflict noticeboard, since I am not a linguist.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your revert

This ist wrong, Hornau is a mountain and Peffingen a part of the city Albstadt and a township. realy two different things. --Codc (talk) 19:28, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I will take care of this, but please next time also add the removed link to an item or create a new item.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

There exist no article in the enWP about this village and Hornung ist indeed a mountain locate at the swabian alb like Pfeffingen. The article Pfeffingen in the enWP is a village of switzerland and not germany. --Codc (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I know. But the article on Hornau should have its Wikidata entry (which I just created), even if there are no other articles on Hornau at the moment. Btw the German article on Hornau is a redirect to Pfeffingen.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

No Hornau is a Disambiguation and there is no mountain as far as i see. --Codc (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

de:Hornau (Schwäbische Alb)--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Congratulations for having become a Wikidata bureaucrat!

Before acting the first time, read Bureaucrats carefully and subscribe to our bureaucrats' mailing list, please.

Thank you very much for volunteering and welcome to our team!

Cheers, Vogone talk 19:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I will be travelling tomorrow, but will do things as soon as I can.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Congrats and welcome aboard! I should have approved your request to join the mailing list :D Legoktm (talk) 06:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks--Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Ярослав, примите и мои поздравления. --Michgrig (talk) 07:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Ildebrando Pizzetti

Hello. Please note that this edit reinserted a wrong interwiki link. --08:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out, I will take care of the link. However, please next time when you remove a link from the item, try to place it somewhere or create a new item. Reverting unexplained link removal is often done to check what happened to the link.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

I've created another item Q13375012 for the Greek and German links. --Michgrig (talk) 08:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Q5742781 - Q4137455

Здраствуйте Ymblanter, я наверно на английском языке неправильно сформировал. дал заявку удалить Q5742781, потому что статья Hero of Artsakh , тоже самое, что Герой Арцаха, или надо соединить, но никто наверно не понял, о чем речь идет.--6AND5 (talk) 11:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Сейчас я посмотрю.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Готово, спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Вам тоже спасибо.--6AND5 (talk) 13:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Здраствуйте Ymblanter, я еще нашел Q4481514-Q8960955.--6AND5 (talk) 12:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Сделал, спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

WD:RFD

SamoaBot 31 is live (example), no more need for this :-) --Ricordisamoa 17:28, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

I already tested it, thanks. But my understanding is that it can not handle cases when not the proposed item was deleted, but the other one.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

It is planned, though. --Ricordisamoa 18:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

 resolved, see links in the RFBOT. --Ricordisamoa 07:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Викидата и заливка статьей

Здравствуйте, Ymblanter. При массовой заливки статьей как правильно добавить ссылки на интервики? Просто добавить ссылку в конце статьи, как раньше это делали, чтобы потом боты перевели их в Викидату, или все таки удобнее реализовать все это через API? У ruwiki, думаю, есть опыт заливки статьей. Буду благодарен, если поделитесь опытом в решении этой проблемы. --Hamlet Muradyan ^talk 17:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Лучше всего сразу добавлять тут интервики на залитые статьи. Если этого не сделать, страницы создаст бот, и их придётся объединять. Если вставить интервики в статью Википедии, как раньше, скорее всего, боты сделают всё сами, но гарантии никто дать не может. К рувики я не имею отношения.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

База данных

Здравствуйте, Ярослав! Не могли бы вы помочь. Ботом обрабатываю астероиды, основываясь на данных JPL Small-Body Database (Q4026990); пример уже выполненной работы: 7328 Casanova (Q985405). Насколько я понял из из этого обсуждения, я использую не совсем верную схему ссылок на базу данных, но понять, как правильно оформить ссылку, я не смог, моего знания английского недостаточно. Не могли бы вы оформить хотя бы одну из ссылок на базу данных правильно, чтобы у меня был корректный пример. Например здесь: астероид (78250) 2002 PE9 (Q8335603), ссылка на его страницу в базе данных: [12]. --Art-top (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Сейчас попробую посмотреть, но у меня сегодня не оченьхорошо со временем, может получиться позже или даже завтра.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Ярослав, не к спеху. Как получится, так получится. Заранее спасибо. --Art-top (talk) 15:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Как я понимаю, пока нет свойства (property) для веб-страниц, так как соответствующий формат пока не поддерживается. Надо ждать, пока включат. Если есть офф-лайновые базы данных, их можно добавлять, могу посмотреть, как.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata:Wikivoyage migration

Hi! Hope it's okay I mentioned your name. --Rschen7754 23:44, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Sure, thanks, I will be happy to help.--Ymblanter (talk) 03:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Closing RfBots

Hi Ymblanter, when you close RfBots, if you use the {{approved}} template, my bot will automatically archive the request to the proper subpage and remove it from the page. Thanks! Legoktm (talk) 02:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Восстановление элемента

Ярослав, здравствуйте. Не могли бы вы проконсультировать, как администратор. Элемент Q91488 был удалён, как дубликат Q91419. Однако он не является полным дубликатом. Удалённый элемент относился к группе игр (2 шт., 1985 и 1989 года), а тот элемент, с которым он был объединён описывает одну игру 1985 года. Также есть отдельный элемент на игру 1989 года (Q91501). Имеет ли смысл в данном случае запрашивать восстановление удалённого элемента и, если да, то куда обращаться? --Art-top (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Да, конечно. Надо начать с удалившего администратора. Если будут коммуникативные трудности, пишите сюда, я с понедельника в обычном режиме.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

RFA closures

Why do you use subst: when you close an RFA (like e. g. here)? I'm just interested because in my opinion the source code gets a bit messy after substituting. Greetings, Vogone talk 13:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

I think in the beginning I just saw that other people were doing this (I obviously do not remember who it was). I am fully open about it, and can try to do without substitutions.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Deleted Item

Why? 1 and 2 --ValterVB (talk) 11:57, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

I was probably merging the items with the gadget (which merges them to the lowest number), and I am not sure why these items survived. I must have deleted another item, into which I merged everything, may be miscalculating the number of digits. I am not sure what happened, will look into it now.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:06, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Now fixed, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

I have seen. Thanks to fix it --ValterVB (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

прошу объединить (3)

Приветствую! Прошу объединить Q9361732 с Q2010141. Мерси --A.Savin (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Сейчас убегаю, часа через два приду, сделаю.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Готово.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Опять галактические войны

Ярослав, пожалуйста, обратите внимание: Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#Q923728. --Art-top (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Да, уже в работе, первую только что защитил на месяц.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Большое спасибо! --Art-top (talk) 20:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

• "Продолжение банкета": NGC 4420 (Q1111253), Arp 299 (Q1786601). --Art-top (talk) 18:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

   Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

  Спасибо! --Art-top (talk) 18:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ymblanter. You have new messages at William915's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GSoC Bot

Hi Ymblanter! Can you take a final look at Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Bot/ProteinBoxBot. It is the bot that is run by the GSoC student. So it would be nice if we could give him some priority so he can get the most out of his time. (Asking you because you do a lot of bot reviewing :). --Tobias1984 (talk) 15:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Left a question over there.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:26, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

прошу объединить (4)

Q4072756 + Q395367. Спасибо! --A.Savin (talk) 10:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Готово.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks...

... a lot for your message and your congratulations! Ayack (talk) 10:45, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Sure, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

SamoaBot 34

Hello, Ymblanter. You have new messages at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/SamoaBot 34.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Ricordisamoa 16:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

"Звёздные войны"

Ярослав, здравствуйте. Защитите, пожалуйста, статью NGC 4377 (Q169979). --Art-top (talk) 19:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Что-то он никак успокоиться не может.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо! Я подобные страницы ставлю в список наблюдения, буду сообщать, если что-то ещё обнаружу. --Art-top (talk) 13:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Да, конечно.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

• Если не трудно, защитите, пожалуйста, ещё эту статью: NGC 5291 (Q1175074). Вандализировалась два раза. --Art-top (talk) 17:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

  Поставил на три месяца--Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

ЗЛВ

Ярослав, добрый день!

Будьте добры, взгляните, почему разобрали страницу, на которой были собраны страницы подготовки шаблонов Знаете ли вы в разных разделах. Здесь видно, как их было много. Тут начали собирать по новой, но причина исчезновения старой страницы мне осталась непонятной. Спасибо, Sealle (talk) 16:48, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Добрый вечер. Спросил у удалившего администратора: [13].--Ymblanter (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Претензии предсказуемые, однако в рамках одного языкового раздела трудно заставить коллег из десятка других разделов держать такую страницу в одном и том же пространстве. Тем не менее, объединение схожих по назначению страниц, на мой взгляд, куда полезнее для проекта, чем их разобщение со ссылкой на букву правил, которые, кстати говоря, ещё не выдержали испытание временем. Если возможно, восстановите, пожалуйста, данную страницу под старым номером. Sealle (talk) 04:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Так просто восстановить страницу, нарушающую правила, я не могу. Завтра, если соберусь, открою тему на общем форуме.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Нет, пожалуй, всё-таки не буду. Все старые интервики уже собраны (в основном, Вашими усилиями) на новой странице, старую восстанавливать незачем, а обсуждение того, могут ли на одной странице быть и шаблоны, и подстраницы шаблонов, боюсь, вряд ли к чему хорошему сейчас приведёт. В частности, могут снова удалить. Поэтому давайте оставим как есть. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Reminder

Hello Ymblanter!

Please remember to update Wikidata:List of administrators, Wikidata:Administrators by language/Table (if possible), Template:CurrentAdmins, Template:AdminsChart and MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins.js every time you promote a new admin. Thank you very much. Vogone talk 13:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I actually remember this, but not always have time to fill in the info right after the promotion. Thanks for reminding anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

{{AdminWelcome}}

Hello Ymblanter, in future could you please subst: the administrator welcome template when you add it to a user talk. You didn't with Cheers!, I have fixed this for you and thought I'll leave you a note. Thanks, John F. Lewis (talk) 04:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I must have screwed it up. Thanks for fixing it.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

ActiveStats

They actually do take into account the MediaWiki namespace edits. There was a bug with the connection to the API. I doubled checked and the counts seem to be correct now.Cyberpower678 (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Помогите разобраться

Здравствуйте. На Вашей странице написано что русский язык для Вас родной, поэтому я написал Вам. Раньше я заходил на Викиданные и на странице видел кнопки «[редактировать]» и «[добавить]». Например на странице Москва. Теперь же при заходе на страницу эти кнопки видны только 2 — 3 секунды и потом пропадают. Я не понимаю почему. Возможно мне надо сделать заявку на получение какого-либо флага? На странице Викиданные:Подтверждённые участники рекомендуется запрашивать флаг автопатрулируемого. Я понимаю что у меня мало правок, но я желаю и могу вносить полезный вклад. В РусВики у меня 1859 правок и ни одной блокировки. Если действительно для возвращения кнопок «[редактировать]» и «[добавить]» нужен флаг, то можно-ли этот пост считать запросом на флаг? --Flint1972 (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Флаг автопатрулируемого я Вам присвоил, но как решать проблему, я не знаю, до сих пор никто ни на что подобное не жаловался. Я вижу, Амир Вам уже ответил, он в технических проблемах разбирается в миллион раз лучше меня, надеюсь, удастся её решить. --Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо. Я надеялся что флаг решит эту проблему, но всё осталось как было, кнопки «[редактировать]» и «[добавить]» мне видны только пока страница не загрузилась до конца. --Flint1972 (talk) 11:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Ecce Homo

Ярослав, подскажите насчёт нидерландской Википедии, пожалуйста. nl:Ecce Homo (Uden) = nl:Ecce Homo (Jheronimus Bosch). Если да, попросите в нужном месте об объединении, если нет, в чём разница? --Infovarius (talk) 10:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Нет, это две разные картины, одна Босха во Франкфурте (вторая), другая, вероятно, последователя Босха в Удене.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Bot

Hi. Would you please see this request. Thanks in advance.--عباس ☢ 11:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

The request has clear problems, and I am not going to approve it. The approval (if this is in order) should be done by someone who has a better understanding of bots than I do.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:52, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Who is able to understand? would you pleas give me a name?--عباس ☢ 12:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

You can try Legoktm (talk • contribs • logs), but he was already looking at the requests yesterday, if he did not approve it he obviously saw a problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Q8506223

Hi Ymblanter, I made a mistake, I thought to have merged the higher number and reverted, meanwhile you deleted. So the 2 cats from Q8972404 are not merged. Sorry and please help.--Oursana (talk) 09:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

I am not sure what happened, but we seem to be fine now.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I added the missing en, mk cats manually.--Oursana (talk) 09:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

About username changing

Hi! I have been renamed from User:Tino 032 to User:Tino on it.wiki (my home project), so I need to be renamed here too, but I cannot find a request page here on wikidata. What should I do? I'm asking to you because I see you are a bureaucrat. Thanks in advance for the help! --Tino 032 (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

The page you are looking for is WD:BN. :) Vogone talk 18:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! I'll write there. :) --Tino 032 (talk) 18:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Notice

[14]. I think it is sufficient if you just advice the users who are getting renamed to open Special:MergeAccount after they were renamed. They automatically get their SUL back then. Vogone talk 15:42, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

I though some of them detach their account from SUL, and a tiny fraction of those do not realize this. But indeed, in the unlikely case there are complaints we can always rename back. Thanks for noticing.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Прошу объединить (5)

Здравствуйте. Q53209 и Q6139559. Спасибо. --A.Savin (talk) 16:35, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Готово.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

А от этого гаджета merge.js какой-нибудь толк необладателю админфлага есть? Я заметил, что вы это используете, активировал у себя, но что-то не вижу пока, как там и что надо нажимать. Вас беспокоить при каждом таком случае не хочу. Выставлять лишний элемент к удалению и ждать когда исполнят - слишком сложно. В админы меня здесь вряд ли изберут. Что же делать? После включения Викисклада я тут часто появляюсь и на дублирующие друг друга элементы натыкаюсь периодически... --A.Savin (talk) 19:16, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Здесь есть два независимых действия. Одно - объединять файлы при помощи гаджета merge. Если он работает (я помню, у Вас с гаджетами была какая-то проблема), то это очень удобно, так как он переносит не только интервики, а вообще всё. Если он установлен, то справа в верхнем углу (там, где переименовать) появляется опция merge. Нажимаете на неё и вводите номер, с чем сливать. А пустые записи, конечно, Вы без флага администратора удалить не сможете. Надо их просто выставлять на удаление тут.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

А-а, теперь нашёл кнопку merge, справа от звёздочки. При следующей оказии испробую. Спасибо еще раз --A.Savin (talk) 20:58, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Этот же merge.js имеет опцию "Request deletion for extra items on RfD", так что даже ходить на RFD не требуется. --Michgrig (talk) 18:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо, тем проще.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Some guidance

With WIDAR now being available, and with some longer streams of (batch) additions that I wish to make, I feel that using my standard user account and WIDAR is going to flood RC, even just for short periods (I did a test run of a simple addition). I have a bot account elsewhere (AWB oriented) and wanted to know which way to approach these series of batch additions, is it just use my standard account, and not worry about RC, or should I be looking at bot permission.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

You can either request a bot permission at WD:RfP (which is probably better if you would be doing it often), or request a flood flag at WD:BN to avoind overlogging RC. The flood flag is faster, a bot approval could take several days even if there are no objections.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

I will try the bot route, there is nothing urgent, and it will be batches over time. If that fails, then I can just bother someone to get flood flag in IRC until they are sick of me. :-) Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Sure. For flood flag, WD:BN is easier: I am not on IRC, and I am not sure all other four crats are.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Hookworm translations

Hi, Ymblanter. I am trying to reconcile the translation lists of https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankilostominfekto and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hookworm, but there is something blocking... and I don't know how to fix it. Could you? Thanks, --Deselliers (talk) 14:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

From what I see, you have done it yesterday.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Вопрос

Здраствуйте увж. Ymblanter, почему у меня в настройках не показывается автопатрулируемый, а только: Член групп: Автоподтверждённые участники, Участники?--6AND5 (talk) 22:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Автопатрулируемых больше нет, у всех автоподтверждённых участников автоматически патрулируются правки.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Понятно, спасибо--6AND5 (talk) 10:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

администраиввная единица

Восстанови, пожалуйста, Q4057633. Его уже второй раз удаляют самым вредным образом. Англоязычные, видимо, не понимают разницы между administrative division в смысле "административное деление" и в смысле "административная единица". Причём даже утверждают, что первого значения вовсе нет, хотя добавляют интервики именно с таким значением в соответствующие элементы. Вообще война идёт по поводу этого смысла (например, см. в Q56061, который обретает то один, то другой смысл). --Infovarius (talk) 05:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

И тут же 분당선M удалил снова. --Michgrig (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Наверное, надо тему на общем форуме поднять, а то так и будут удалять и восстанавливать. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Ссылки на Викисклад

Добрый день! У меня на СО кто-то утверждает, что в элементы персоналий якобы не нужно добавлять соответствующую категорию на Викискладе, и это якобы нормально, что в этой категории тогда не будут показываться интервики. Что якобы такую категорию нужно добавлять только если бы у этой персоны была собственная тематическая категория в википедии (что в конкретном случае едва ли возможно, за низкой степенью значимости). Это правда? Вообще-то связность категорий Викисклада и статей Википедии - великое дело, и по мне - без разницы, показывет ли статья на категорию или статья на статью, но, вполне возможно, я проспал принятие каких-то новых правил. --A.Savin (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Существуют три способа связи с Викискладом: свойство P373 (категория Викисклада), ещё одно (галерея Викисклада) - они оба находятся в блоке свойств - и поле для интервик в самом низу. Если речь о статье в Википедии, то в поле внизу должна идти галерея, а не категория (см. обсуждение здесь. В светлом будущем внизу появятся два окна, одно для категории Викисклада, другое для галереи, но пока по итогу опроса ставится галерея. Решение, вероятно, не самое удачное, но связность обеспечивается через P373. Например, в Викигиде мы именно оттуда берём категорию Викисклада и показываем её в статьях в поле слева.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Merging items

Hi, I noticed that you reverted a move I had done (Q933555) in order to maintain the item with the lowest #. Should I always do so? From reading Help:Merge#Select recipient item I understood that keeping the lowest Q#### is not all that important:

"... one item is selected to be the recipient of the sitelinks and properties. This is usually the item that is used more often. If you can't tell, best choose the one with the lowest Q####, as it is the oldest item.".

Perhaps the Help page should be mended if the consensus regarding this matter has changed. Best, Capmo (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

I usually look at the links, and keep the item which has links. If there are no links, and the items were mergd recently (so that there is little chance that there are external links to the item), I use the one with the lowest Q#.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Capmo (talk) 12:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Functional specification

Уважаемый Ymblanter, ты, несомненно, справедливо отменил мою правку Functional specification, ибо она была неверной. Но тогда я не пойму, как мне сделать верную. Я хочу убрать из немецкой статьи Pflichtenheft ссылку на русский термин "Техническое задание", ибо эта ссылка неверна ("Техническое задание" соответствует Lastenheft, а не Pflichtenheft). Я бы мог в теле немецкой статьи сделать ссылку на правильный русский перевод - но мне он неизвестен. Поэтому мне нужно ограничиться именно удалением неправильного перевода. Объясни, пожалуйста, на пальцах, что и где мне править? MyBenutzername (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Я всё сделал, посмотрите, пожалуйста. Но если это так, то возникают проблемы и с другими языками, например, украинским.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

JWbot bot flag

Hi! Could you grant the bot flag before the break? WD:BN --JulesWinnfield-hu (talk) 21:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Q15966518 и Q4222375

Приветствую! Я не могу посмотреть что было на удалённой странице... Но данная ТЕОС Китай-город была упразднена в 2002 году. Может не надо было сюда переносить актуальную ссылку Викигида? --TarzanASG (talk) 14:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Всё, что было на удалённой странице, я перенёс на новую. Территориально наша статья Кремль и Китай-Город и статья русской Википедии про ТАОС Китай-Город совпадают, поэтому я их и слил, но если Вы найдёте лучшее соответствие статье Викигида в Википедии, я могу ссылку отправить туда.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Часть того, что вы перенесли, я убрал. ТЕОС не являлся районом и был упразднён, если я правильно понимаю, ещё до появления закона о внутригородских муниципальных образованиях. Кремль и Китай-Город сейчас входят в Тверской район, а ТЕОС уже не существует. Может не стоит привязыкать Викигид к несуществющем объектам? Не следует ли восстановить удалённую страницу Q15966518? Я так и не понял откуда там взялся район. --TarzanASG (talk) 21:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Так история правок же есть, вот что там было. Если Вы мне скажете, куда ещё привязать, я привяжу, мне всё равно.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

To merge

День добрый! Автоматически не соединяются две статьи: ru:Пфлюгер и de:Pflüger Спасибо за помощь. --Marimarina (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done Всё сделал.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:41, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Аналогичная просьба для статей: ru:Дюэм и fr:Duhem. Спасибо за помощь. --Marimarina (talk) 07:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 07:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Help with railway stations

Hi Ymblanter, I'm try to add the country (P17) to every railway station (Q55488) (and subclasses). I did this with most items, but I have some leftovers. The list contains quite a few Russian items. Could you help out here? Multichill (talk) 15:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Sure. Please update the list from time to time.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the help! I did some more myself and I applied a bit of filtering. Looks like we only have Russian items left now. Multichill (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Great, I will finish doing them within a couple of days.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Nice, in this report three violations are now empty. Multichill (talk) 12:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Strange, I am still not done.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

That's because non of the items left use adjacent station (P197). Multichill (talk) 16:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Adjacent station is more difficult, but when I am done with P17 I can look at these as well.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Adding adjacent station (P197) is a bit more work, but can be a fun puzzle. You need to add the next stations on the physical line, see for example Haarlem railway station (Q800863). This forms a nice web which I plot on a map. A lot of Western Europe (Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemburg, Spain, etc) has been done. Germany is more difficult because a lot of the smaller stations are missing here in Wikidata. With the eastern part of Europe I hit a language barrier. I did some parts around St. Petersburg (map) but I got stuck. I use Wikipedia as the basis for the information and I have OSM with transport layer to check where I'm going.

Maybe you can get Moscow connected to the rest of Europe? Multichill (talk) 09:18, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

I can do that, but let me first finish with P17.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Manual changes to years in New Mexico

Hi, I noticed that you had reverted some category deletions by HooBot. I've been writing to the owner about those, and have asked Emaus if his bot can take over that work.

I got here from admin work on English wiki categories for discussion. Just out of interest, what led you to manually change those categories? Fayenatic london (talk) 17:50, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

I am watching this page and try to correct the entries when i have time. Those entries where the category does not exist I just delete, but if the category has been renamed I hve to take care of it manually. If there is a bot reliably doing this work for renamed categories this would be of course preferable.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Wow. What labour of love. Thanks for all you do. Fayenatic london (talk) 08:07, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

I created bugzilla:64815. You should probably ask other admins to update Wikidata before they delete an empty category. Multichill (talk) 10:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Ссылки на Викиданные в Википедии

Здравствуйте,

к сожалению, опять вынужден побеспокоить с дебильными техническими вопросами.

В некоторых статьях русской Википедии давно существует в колонке слева ссылка на соответствующий элемент ВД. В некоторых же = нет, хотя элемент есть и ссылка на статью в ВП там вроде бы есть.

Например, в ru:Нарбут, Фёдор Фёдорович нет слева ссылок ни на склад, ни на данные; очистка кеша тоже не помогает. Элемент ВД есть: Q4313083, там ссылка на статью и на викисклад, в чем дело? --A.Savin (talk) 18:44, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Я вижу в статье обе ссылки, наверное, всё-таки проблема с кешированием.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Несколько пытался на purge, еще и еще раз, а также заново грузить. Открыл, наконец, статью в IE, которым вообще не пользуюсь. Все то же самое. Опять, лишний раз убеждаешься что все тут через жопу делается, впору объявлять забастовку. --A.Savin (talk) 20:35, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Честно говоря, я даже не знаю, что тут можно сделать, так как плохо разбираюсь в mediawiki. Может, в русской Википедии спросить? Там же включёно расширение.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Bot flag

Quick note to say thanks for setting up the botflag on AGbot - everything's working smoothly now and I've got a few thousand edits done this evening already :-). Lots of work to do! Andrew Gray (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Sure, you are welcome.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:51, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Gymnocalycium terweemeanum (Q1558407)

Hi Ymblanter, please undo the merge. [15]: Echinocactus platensis var. terweemeanus is the basionym of Gymnocalycium terweemeanum. Thanks. --Succu (talk) 13:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

 Done, thanks for pointing it out.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Freedom of information laws by country

Why did you revert my action? [16] The article "fi:Julkisuuslaki" tells about a finnish law and does not list FOIs by country. So the finnish article is about "Freedom of information in Finland", there is no article for it in any other wiki, so that is the reason for the removal. It's like if you linked enwiki article "en:Freedom of information in the United States" to the "Freedom of information laws by country" (Q329497). -Hypree (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

thank you for your explanations, I removed the link.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Q16014290

Ярослав, можешь восстановить? В таксономическом проекте принято разделение вида и монотипного рода. --Infovarius (talk) 10:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Восстановил, но для разделения у меня недостаточно квалификации.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Язык на странице запросов

Здравствуйте! Скажите пожалуйста, а на страницах запросов (вроде этой) все сообщения должны быть только на английском языке, или все же таки допустимы другие (например, русский)? Карибеков В. Ю. ^-обс- 16:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Можете, конечно, писать по-русски, но единственный русскоязычный администратор тут я. Если хотите более широкую аудиторию, лучше писать по-английски.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Ясно. Благодарю за оперативный ответ! Карибеков В. Ю. (talk) 16:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Вопрос

Здраствуйте Ymblanter, Вы можете сказать, куда надо обратится для создании патрульной системы в армянской Википедии, как сейчас есть в русской Википедии. Заранее спасибо--6AND5 (talk) 20:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

К разработчикам, открыть запрос в Багзилле.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Большое спасибо, то есть здесь?[17]--6AND5 (talk) 06:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Да.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Q17156976

Добрый день. Можно ли защитить как-то от правок? Из статьи в рувики упорно добавляются интервики, не имеющие ничего общего с темой статьи (Статья была на удалении и что бы показать её значимость к ней налепили фальшивок). То есть к трём статьям о нападении на погранзаставу лепят взрыв в центре Луганска. --ze-dan (talk) 03:38, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Ставить на полную защиту её явно не нужно (там же интервики вполне и по делу добавлены, насколько я могу судить), зато для русской статьи я создал отделúю запись, будет меньше искушения добавлять её сюда, это явно разные события.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:38, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Merge-project requiring language skills

Dear Wikidatan,

Even though Wikidata phase 1 (replacing interlanguage by Wikidata) is officially finished, there are still a lot a duplicate items that should be merged. Projects to list possible duplicates (and therefore possibles mergers) have been started by users such as Pasleim with User:Pasleim/projectmerge and Ivan A. Krestinin with User:Ivan A. Krestinin/To merge. Those bot-generated lists do however contain quite some false positives and therefore still need a human eye to decide whether to merge or not.

Since you are an administrator on Wikidata with knowledge of the Russian language, User:Ivan A. Krestinin/To merge/ruwiki might benefit from your help. As said, it lists couples of WD items that might possibly be merged. If you are already involved in these projects or not interested, I am sincerely sorry for bothering you.

With kind regards, FakirNL (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, these pages are on my watchlist, and I am helping when I have time.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you! Gabbe (talk) 06:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

You are welcome.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Work vs. single edition

Hi Ymblanter, you have merged the work Elminster – The Making of a Mage (Q3051580) with one of its editions Elminster: la nascita di un mago (2000) (Q3723580). For the difference between work ("book") and edition see Wikidata:WikiProject Books. (Deutsch: Es gibt einen Unterschied zwischen dem Werk Hamlet und den einzelnen Ausgaben, z.B. Hamlet. Prinz von Dänemark in der Übersetzung von A. Müller, Berlin 1910.) Cheers --Kolja21 (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

I do not remeber anything as it ws two months ago, but I can just restore the item if you take care of the rest.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

You don't need to remember, but you need to look at it or you will do the same error again. And of cause I'll take care of it. --Kolja21 (talk) 17:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks --Kolja21 (talk) 19:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

ISO-format date precision

Добрый день, Ярослав. Взгляните, пожалуйста — как получается, что при установке параметру precision значения 7 (век), дата 1815-08-15 отображается как 18. century вместо XIX-го? С уважением, Sealle (talk) 03:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Честно говоря, не знаю, надо на форуме (Project Chat) спрашивать.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

• Разместил, однако, судя по нулевой реакции на очевидную ошибку, вряд ли это как-то продвинет вопрос. А технических админов в проекте нет? Sealle (talk) 04:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

  Я там задал вопрос, если не будет реакции, перенесём к разработчикам.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Iberodorcadion (Q14897109)

Hi Ymblanter, this merge mixed (again) a genus and a subgenus. Please undo the merge and fix the backlinks. Thanks --Succu (talk) 06:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 07:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

An important message about renaming users

Dear Ymblanter,

I am cross-posting this message to many places to make sure everyone who is a Wikimedia Foundation project bureaucrat receives a copy. If you are a bureaucrat on more than one wiki, you will receive this message on each wiki where you are a bureaucrat.

As you may have seen, work to perform the Wikimedia cluster-wide single-user login finalisation (SUL finalisation) is taking place. This may potentially effect your work as a local bureaucrat, so please read this message carefully.

Why is this happening? As currently stated at the global rename policy, a global account is a name linked to a single user across all Wikimedia wikis, with local accounts unified into a global collection. Previously, the only way to rename a unified user was to individually rename every local account. This was an extremely difficult and time-consuming task, both for stewards and for the users who had to initiate discussions with local bureaucrats (who perform local renames to date) on every wiki with available bureaucrats. The process took a very long time, since it's difficult to coordinate crosswiki renames among the projects and bureaucrats involved in individual projects.

The SUL finalisation will be taking place in stages, and one of the first stages will be to turn off Special:RenameUser locally. This needs to be done as soon as possible, on advice and input from Stewards and engineers for the project, so that no more accounts that are unified globally are broken by a local rename to usurp the global account name. Once this is done, the process of global name unification can begin. The date that has been chosen to turn off local renaming and shift over to entirely global renaming is 15 September 2014, or three weeks time from now. In place of local renames is a new tool, hosted on Meta, that allows for global renames on all wikis where the name is not registered will be deployed.

Your help is greatly needed during this process and going forward in the future if, as a bureaucrat, renaming users is something that you do or have an interest in participating in. The Wikimedia Stewards have set up, and are in charge of, a new community usergroup on Meta in order to share knowledge and work together on renaming accounts globally, called Global renamers. Stewards are in the process of creating documentation to help global renamers to get used to and learn more about global accounts and tools and Meta in general as well as the application format. As transparency is a valuable thing in our movement, the Stewards would like to have at least a brief public application period. If you are an experienced renamer as a local bureaucrat, the process of becoming a part of this group could take as little as 24 hours to complete. You, as a bureaucrat, should be able to apply for the global renamer right on Meta by the requests for global permissions page on 1 September, a week from now.

In the meantime please update your local page where users request renames to reflect this move to global renaming, and if there is a rename request and the user has edited more than one wiki with the name, please send them to the request page for a global rename.

Stewards greatly appreciate the trust local communities have in you and want to make this transition as easy as possible so that the two groups can start working together to ensure everyone has a unique login identity across Wikimedia projects. Completing this project will allow for long-desired universal tools like a global watchlist, global notifications and many, many more features to make work easier.

If you have any questions, comments or concerns about the SUL finalisation, read over the Help:Unified login page on Meta and leave a note on the talk page there, or on the talk page for global renamers. You can also contact me on my talk page on meta if you would like. I'm working as a bridge between Wikimedia Foundation Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Stewards, and you to assure that SUL finalisation goes as smoothly as possible; this is a community-driven process and I encourage you to work with the Stewards for our communities.

Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) talk 18:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

Значки избранных статьей

Здраствуйте увж. Ymblanter, как я понял сейчас бот добавляет эти значки прямо в WIKIDATA, а если сейчас например будет избрана новая статья, после этого, как добавить значок избранной статьи?--6AND5 (talk) 12:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Можно вручную добавить, можно дождаться, когда бот сам всё сделает.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:54, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Спасибо, я увидел как можно вручную добавить, а бот как будет узнать, что статья стала избранной ? (например в русской википедии хотят удалить шаблоны Link FL и GA)--6AND5 (talk) 05:09, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

По категории, я думаю. Точно не знаю.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:33, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

WD:PC#Q18000000

Did you found reliable latin source for enwiki article? — by Revi_complaint? at 14:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Is this the same place?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:17, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes. — by Revi_complaint? at 14:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. It will be enough for a stub. Let me create it, and then it can possibly be expanded with other sources.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

I created a stub.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Got it. I'll expand it tomorrow, or whenever my time allows! — by Revi_complaint? at 18:03, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

No hurry, thanks in advance.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Someone moved the article I created to a different item, apparently it is not the same.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Заявка на статус бота

Здравствуйте, не могли бы вы рассмотреть мою заявку на статус боту или помочь с её оформлением/переводом? В руВП имею статус с ноября 2013. --Dima st bk (talk) 01:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Если Вы уже готовы её подать, надо включить сюда. Скорее всего, попросят сделать тестовые равки, так что лучше сразу сделать и об этом написать.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:48, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Another change needed

Thanks for that. The change about data type went fine. I would like to ask you for another change that needs doing as requested here, and the exact same needs changing here too. I'd much appreciate if you can make the change, as the new word is more suitable than the old one. Cheers! --B. Jankuloski (talk) 12:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Both  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 14:11, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Ivan Franko

Why this revert (diff) ?

Ivan Franko (Q332462) seems plainly the same person as c:Creator:Ivan Franko, so surely Commons Creator page (P1472) was entirely appropriate? Why the revert? Jheald (talk) 20:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

I am sorry, this is clearly my oversight. I was trying to revert a vandal who removed interwiki links just befor your edits. I restored the good version now, thanks for letting me know.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Германия

Ярослав, добрый день! Создаётся впечатление, что последняя правка на странице q183, увеличившая её размер вдвое, почти до 1 Mb, привела к проблемам с редактированием в рувики статей, ссылающихся на неё. Попытки править эту страницу здесь приводят к ошибке сервера. См. ru:ВП:ФТ#Не сохраняются изменения в нескольких статьях. Приходилось ли Вам сталкиваться с подобным, и есть ли рецепт восстановления нормальной работы страницы? Sealle (talk) 12:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

• UPD: bugzilla:71519. Будем ждать. Sealle (talk) 13:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

  Вижу, Вы уже нашли.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Нужел ли данный файл?

Доброе время суток!
В Википедии была откачена вандальная версия страницы, в которой был использован этот очень сомнительный файл. Мне думается, что это обычная фотожаба, которой не место здесь. Прошу Вас взглянуть, нужен ли этот файл. С уважением, -- Baden-Paul (talk) 14:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Спасибо, вынес на удаление--Ymblanter (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Merging and redirect wikidata item

Hi, Can you please tell me what is the benifit of redirecting a wikidata item. Because it is not same as wikipedia article, so I couldn't understand the meaning of wikidata redirect.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 09:15, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

The main reason is that external sites (including Wikimedia projects)‎ can refer to this item, and after deletion, the links become void.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok, but I have seen few item which I have completely merged with other item and you have redirected another link instead of deleting.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 12:36, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not see your point. I currently delete new items and categories and redirect everything else.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

No, it's ok and I got answer of my question. Thanks.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 17:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Bot question

Hi. Thanks for approving Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/L_PBot. Just wondering if the flag request is implicit in that request or if I would/should have made that explicit before turning to WD:BN to have it turned on. Cheers Lokal Profil (talk) 07:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

To early in the morning (i.e. I looked at the flag category not the log). Please disregard the above and thanks again. /Lokal Profil (talk) 08:16, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Lev Mei

Hi Yaroslav. Being new to Wikidata, I thought I'd ask you about an issue I've been having. Your fellow admin Cycn has been silently edit-warring with me here and here. What he's doing makes the interwiki article links at Lev Mei's Commons category disappear. I had planned to add more Russian writers, athletes, etc to Wikidata, but not if I have to fight to do so. Also, why are there 2 pages for one man - the same minor poet Lev Alexandrovich Mei? I don't know anything about Wikidata, but my other 200+ additions of Commons cats haven't been reverted. I ask you because with Cycn's behavior so far, I don't expect much help from him. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 00:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

INeverCry (talk • contribs • logs) was adding Categories from Commons to article items and even removes them from their corresponding category item, which is plainly incorrect. - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 07:48, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

We have indeed one page for the article and another one for the category (same way as in Wikipedia). Currently the consensus is that Commons categories should be added to the category page. They can also be added to the article page, but not as links, but rather as statements, via the property Property:P373.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

revert of Q5964

I am annoyed at your thoughtless revert. did you read my post on the talk page before you reverted? did you check the meaning of the page? it is currently wrong. please undo the revert and merge this page Q18152333 into Q5964 19:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately your post at the talk page is incomprehensible. Please add ALL correct interwiki links yourself without triggering vandalism abuse filter (new editor removing the interwiki links wwhich are not added elsewhere).--Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

I updated the talk to fix the confusion. If you just look at the page in question you will see that it is not a speedydeletion page but the articles for deletion. There is a bug in the merge page that prevents me from running the merge which is why it was not updated. I am working on it. Mdupont (talk) 10:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Also I take offence to the term new user. I have accounts on wikipedia for i suppose 10 years. I also described my problem to the guy who left a talk message to me about the merge. I still say this was a thoughtless revert, and I find we have too much of that going on here on the wiki projects. Mdupont (talk) 10:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

If you are not new (though the abuse filter thinks differently), you should be perfectly able to do it yourself. I am only seven years on Wikipedia. Please do it, for both speedy deletion and AfD.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

You do not need to use merge, just remove the link from one page and add it to another page.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:34, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Comons cats on article pages here, etc, etc...

Have a look at this. If you reverse this addition, made by @-revi:, you'll be leaving the Commons category of the defending Olympic Champion in ladies figure skating singles with no interwiki, unless you also add interwiki to c:Category:Adelina_Sotnikova or move it to another item here. How many other instances like this exist? Likely thousands added by -revi and many others. I just wonder why I was able to do 200+ additions like this, now reverted by Cycn, over the course of a whole week, without anyone noticing and telling me I was doing the wrong thing? If commonscats (or other category links) shouldn't be added to article items here, than perhaps someone can find a way to block their addition, so this doesn't happen again? Oh well, I'll head back to Commons now to fix the rest of my mess... {{sigh}} INeverCry 00:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

I've noticed this happening all over the place, and have given up on reverting. I think we need to come up with some other solution... --Rschen7754 01:02, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Also on Q30758 (Ana Ivanovic). I can show many others examples of some very high-visibilty people. It's such an easy process to add the commons cat to the article item here, thereby transferring the interwiki here. Too bad for Commons that Wikidata doesn't allow it. Q30758 having the commonscat allows Commons users to easily make one click to get to any of Ana's 100 or so articles, rather than having links to a handful of categories that nobody cares about. I would ask Yaroslav, as a Commons admin, and you Rschen7754, to tell me how it's helpful to have c:Category:Roger Federer link to categories in 14 languages rather than his articles in 124 languages as it used to before Wikidata took over? For now, I have to return the old interwiki to commonscats, even for such major athletes as Li Na of China. INeverCry 01:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

• I've brought this up at COM:AN (a link to the VP post) and c:Commons:Village_pump#Questionable_policy_on_Wikidata_regarding_Commons_categories. I also added a commons cat to Q53421; otherwise, Mary Joe Fernandez, an Olympic Gold medalist, has no interwiki whatsoever on Commons, and I have no clue at all what a statement or a property is. If someone wants to help me and Mary Joe's fans out and create a statement or a property for her, so that I can copy how you do it in future, and do some good work here, that would be very much appreciated. Remember, I'm a very busy person who just passed 200,000 log actions on Commons, along with 175,000 edits, so someone work with me, ok? INeverCry 02:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm striking that last. Adding the commonscat to the article item here is simpler and smarter. Categories are the equivalent of articles when it comes to Commons. INeverCry 02:29, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

It was decided in a RFC on Wikidata somewhere (probably linked off d:WD:RFC I think, don't have the time to dig for it now). What I vaguely remember was that the devs only allowed for one link per wiki, which isn't exactly ideal for Commons because of the categories vs. galleries issues (or for Incubator and a few other sites, but that's another issue entirely). So to keep things "pure" we (well, it was a majority of like 50-60%, not that strong) went with the current approach of keeping the namespaces separate, and using the Commons property (the number I forget, unfortunately) to link between the two. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be that well documented anywhere; even an abusefilter to warn people about it would be an improvement at this point. I'm afraid that there's all sorts of inconsistencies related to this in the data by now, about a year later... *sigh* and I've been mostly inactive on Wikidata and haven't had time to try and start a discussion about fixing it. --Rschen7754 05:55, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, the RFC came to the conclusion that Commons pages, not categories, should be linked in the link field, and categories, at least until there is a technical possibility to link up two pages from the same project, should be linked via property P:P373. This is not my preferred solution, but for the time being we have to live with it.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Вандализм

Почему вы сделали откат моей правки? [18]
Статья избранная в сардинской Википедии, как видно на главной странице: sc:Pàgina_printzipale: sc:Wikipedia:Artìculos de su mese, sc:Non compores mercantzia russa!--Сергій Липко (talk) 01:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Это никак не видно в самой статье.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

И я не вижу, почему статья месяца - то же самое, что избранная статья. Никаких интервик там не стоит, никакого голосоваия я не нашёл. Возможно, Вам стоит поднять этот вопрос в сардинской вики.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Просто они ещё не сделали шаблон ru:Шаблон:Избранная_статья. Их Википедия мелкая, постепенно развивается, это их право отмечать лучшие статьи, а не ваше!--Сергій Липко (talk) 06:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Разумеется, просто я не вижу никаких признаков того, что эта статья избранная. Кроме того, что Вы заспамили всю Википедию, вставив значки избранной во все языковые проекты.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Я уже написал почему: как видно на главной странице: sc:Pàgina_printzipale: sc:Wikipedia:Artìculos de su mese, sc:Non compores mercantzia russa!. Возможно, такой вид "избранной" статьи переходной, но факт остается фактом.--Сергій Липко (talk) 09:58, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Вопрос не в этом, а почему Вы статью месяца называете избранной. Как видно, сама Сардинская Википедия так не думает.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Потому что выбирают самую лучшую в месяце и обозначают звёздочкой --Сергій Липко (talk) 11:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Пусть сами поставят интервики отсюда сюда тогда.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Древнерусское государство

Здравствуйте! Участник Антон патріот упорно изменяет интервики со статьи "Древнерусское государство" в русской Википедии Q1108445 на свою только что созданную статью про термин в украинской Википедии Q18632567. Полагаю, его следует заблокировать с учётом лога блокировок. --Andreykor (talk) 17:55, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

6 месяцев.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

SweetBot

Approved, but without the bot flag. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

It says I have assigned the flag yesterday.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh I see. I wrote you because I saw the bot on RC without any flag and didn't realise that the logs were from before assigning time. Sorry for bothering you then and thank you for your work in WD. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:46, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

No problem, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Autopatroller

Hello! dear Ymblanter, can you please grant me the auto patrolller right? i am very familiar with WikiData's policies and guidelines and i believe that that will especially be useful to me.Also to mark the new pages create by me as patrolled. Best Regards --Grind24 (talk) 12:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

From what I see, you are already autoconfirmed.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Autoconfirmed don't allow me to mark page as patroled, this right will be useful to automatically marks new pages created by me as patrolled and to reduce the workload of new page patrollers.You can add me Autoreview or Autopatroller right.--Grind24 (talk) 14:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

We do not have these rights on Wikidata. Autoconfirmed does the job.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Oups sorry for the disturbing. I am a few confused , rollbacker will be sufficient ,thanks for your time :) . Regards --Grind24 (talk) 18:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry but I do not have evidence of sufficient experience for grantig you a rollback flag. You may remember that you were previously not granted the rollback in the English Wikipedia for the same reason. May be you should stop collecting flags and concentrate on work in the mainspace.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Astrovandal

There is some unusual type of vandal, who change the name of this particular article: Q3715696, it has to be semi-protected. Best regards, --C3r4 (talk) 21:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 04:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

It started again with reverting bot edits. See here Q1121262. --C3r4 (talk) 06:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

I found two IPs, blocked both of them, and semi-protected all articles they ever edited.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. --C3r4 (talk) 07:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Jura1

Приветствую! Я уже не первый раз вижу вклад этого участника, который, судя по всему, скриптом добавляет свойство имя для персоналий. При этом ряд добавлений у него явно некорректные. Например, он для римских пап добавляет свойство "имя" Papa (Q17018239) (пример). По хорошему такие правки надо откатывать, но там их много, с моей учётки можно только отменять, но это весьма муторное занятие. Как лучше действовать в таком случае?--Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

• Хотя как я вижу, он отменяет свои правки, так что вопрос снят.--Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 21:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

  Если будут ешё проблемы, проще всего сначала обсудить с ним.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

• Добрый день, прошу Вас вновь обратить внимание на странные действия участника Jura1: User talk:Jura1#Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky. Sealle (talk) 11:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Q13283032; request

Happy New Year, Ymblanter! Since I had Category:People from Forst (Lausitz) (Q13283032) on my watchlist, I noticed a change of the item earlier today, but my actual question is if you could remove the space between "Персоналии:" and "Форст (Лужица)" over at the Russian Wikipedia (like I did here with this edit to the ru-label). I'm really not sure of the usual category-renaming procedure over there :) cheers! Jared Preston (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jared, also happy New year to you. Unfortunately, as a matter of principle, I do not edit the Russian Wikipedia. Sorry for not being able to help this time.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh OK, I didn't even look to see if you were active there. My apologies! I will ask the original category creator over there then. All the best! Jared Preston (talk) 18:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Champions

Regarding this edit, the Dutch page of "Kampioen" is a disambiguation page. All of the other language pages are regarding the "Champions" role-playing game, which the Dutch disambiguation page does not even mention, so it is unrelated to the rest of these. 65.126.152.254 15:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Good, but would you please now create a Wikidata entry for w:nl:Kampioen.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Q1046236

Hi Ymblanter. You blocked Q1046236. de:LH 58 does not seem to be the same since the article describes 4 different objects while the language links of Q1046236 describe a single one. Insofar the IP removing the de.wikipedia-link was correct. Could you please unlock the page or resp. remove the de.wikipedia-link? Thank you very much in advance, --Gereon K. (talk) 20:51, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

But it is only semi-protected, and you can edit it.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

I do not hold any user rights as autopatrolled, uploader or editor on Wikidata [19]. It is not possible for me to edit Q1046236. --Gereon K. (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been autopatrolled since 2013. Did you actually try to edit the item? If you can not edit it, I will take the technical issue to the Project Chat, since you definitely should be.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Editing this item is not possible for me. My status as "autopatrolled" in Wikidata does not show in the global user rights. :-( --Gereon K. (talk) 08:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

I removed the German item and opened the topic at Wikidata:Project chat#Semiprotection Q1046236 and userrights. You should have been autoconfirmed (we do not have autopatrollers anymore), I am not sure what happened with your user rights.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

ip 46.14.84.183

How is possible? Blocked at 22:07, 16 feb 2015 bud edit at 22:59, 16 feb 2015. --ValterVB (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Founded "Prevent this user from editing their own talk page while blocked" not checked. --ValterVB (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, they can edit their own page. This is so called Astrovandal, and their damage is in the items, so I usually let them write at their talk page whatever they want.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Удаление личной страницы

Добрый день. Прошу удалить мою личную страницу участника (необходимо для отображения глобальной страницы). Спасибо. Hausratte (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 09:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Unwanted

Please explain per what policy you didn't delete the page I created by mistake and asked for deletion and you archived it? I'll have to replace it in the future with other tasks. Mjbmr (talk) 12:32, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I kept it for the record. Why can not you create Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Mjbmrbot 3 next time?--Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

For what record? there were not discussion made on it. btw the bot template show all requests not only approved ones. good luck. Mjbmr (talk) 12:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Pleae take it to the Project Chat, up to now we never deleted a single request for permission.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

That doesn't mean there is a policy for it. Mjbmr (talk) 12:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

This is exactly the reason why it should be discussed in a broader context than my talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I think it should be discussed about your action, thanks. Mjbmr (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

The Russian Messenger (Q19577155), The Russian Messenger (Q1850566) и Juan Mayordomo

Добрый день! Вы немного знаете испанский, не могли бы вы объяснить в User talk:Juan Mayordomo, почему я отменил слияние этих элементов, а то он английского не знает. -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 04:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Написал, посмотрим, что будет дальше.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Спасибо. -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Question about bureaucrats

Hi, one month ago I left a message in Wikidata talk:Requests for permissions that received no answer. It was not important per se, but some weeks ago when I realized noone was answering, I was surfing a little bit trying to understand more this discrepancy and I though that bureaucrats, considering they deal with flags more than other users, maybe could know the answer. That's when I realized that you were the most active bureaucrat on wikidata. Actually I am sure that when I saw the list there were 4, now you are 3! I was surprised. Just out of curiosity: it is not a very used flag here? Because if it is, and an election might be necessary, I would like to suggest a candidate. Actually, I have two, both it-N sysop here.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

No, election does not seem necessary at this point, we do not have much work. Sorry for not answering your message at the talk page, it somehow escaped my attention. The flag is indeed deprecated and I know nothing on how it should be (or is) included in the edit count, but I will see whether it can be documented somewhere.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

no problem, the real curiosity was more about the discrepancy between the editcounters summary, and that's not urgent at all.

If there is not much to do here as a bureaucrat and you are "in the mood", I suggest you to apply for meta:Global renamers. There is some need for expert user due to the increase of workload after the SUL finalization. --Alexmar983 (talk) 09:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I am not a technical expert, and it is likely that I will not be able to answer your question about the editcount. It might be easier to ask at the Wikidata:Project Chat. Concerning global renamer, I was indeed offered as a crat a chance to apply, but I am afraid right now with an admin flag on four projects (including English Wikipedia) and increasing responsibilities in my daily job I am just fully booked for the time being.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I will ask there. About the flag, to be honest I was surprised that you weren't asked to be a steward yet...--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:32, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Kirazalan turkish village DUPLICATE!

This article is more, as well as what is not restored at stub!

Q5994633 is BAD!

Q4828851 is GOOD!

They can not be merged, as there are two articles in Turkish on the same topic. Please sort it out in Turkish Wikipedia first (merge or delete).--Ymblanter (talk) 11:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Bot Approval

Hi Ymblanter! Would you please see my bot request here. Thanks alot in advance. -- File:Eagle.svg.pngTulsi Bhagat (Talk) 07:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Sure, I add all bot permission requests to my watchlist.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Already 2 or 3 days past requested that bot and no any action. So, I leave message here in your talk page. -- File:Eagle.svg.pngTulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

I was recently criticized for approving bot tasks too soon, and I decided to wait longer. Do not worry about this part.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:35, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok! it's alright. -- File:Eagle.svg.pngTulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Question about bulk imports

Greetings, I noticed that someone asked for a flood flag to do a bulk import. I was wondering how that was done? Is there a tool for that or is that something only certain people are allowed to do (I.e. admins). I'm not planning on doing it anytime soon but as I learn how to use this project it seems like that would be useful when dealing with commons and some other sites. Thanks. Reguyla (talk) 19:53, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I am not the right person to ask. You may want to ask the user who has actually done the import, or on the Project Chat.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh ok thanks. Reguyla (talk) 20:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Как добавить поле?

Добрый день! Хотел добавить автограф Маяковского в соответствущий элемент, но не нашёл нужного поля. У Пастернака, например, есть специальное поле Signature, а Маяковского нет. Подскажите, как его добавить. --Kaidor (talk) 15:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Нажать на "добавить" ("add") ниже всех свойств.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Получилось. Спасибо. --Kaidor (talk) 16:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Help adding a link

I want to add a link ml:വിക്കിപീഡിയ:ലേഖനങ്ങൾക്കുള്ള അപേക്ഷ to en:Project:Requested articles Q4664111. I cant add as it is locked. Help appreciated.-- 117.203.91.244

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Просьба помочь

Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Other_rights#Pessimist2006 Pessimist (talk) 13:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Написал там, слежу за развитием ситуации. В технических вопросах, к сожалению, я мало что понимаю.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:56, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Спасибо. Я и сам не очень понимаю как такое получается, но мой домашний IP-адрес забанили как открытый прокси. А почему он так определяется - бог весть, какие-то настройки у провайдера, видимо. В рувики мне флаг исключения из IP-блокировок дали сразу, а вот во всех прочих местах мучаюсь с Оперой Турбо чтобы обойти эту проблему. Pessimist (talk) 15:29, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Давайте некоторое время подождём ещё комментариев, потом я что-нибудь придумаю.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Q6790853 и Q20665335

Ярослав, добрый день. Есть какой-то способ прекратить регулярное объединение страниц о совершенно разных людях? Описание с просьбой более этого не делать не помогает. Может, кто-нибудь уже напишет о втором статью в enwiki, тогда и полегчает? :) Sealle (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Нет, боюсь, только, действительно, написать на одном языке статьи про обоих. На всякий случай поставил в список наблюдения.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Q51628

Please see my message in Talk:Q51628. -Betterknower (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

No puedo editar «Establecer etiqueta, descripción y alias»

Hola,

Llegué a tu discusión por el Babel que, según sabes algo de español. He intentado completar los datos de «Establecer etiqueta, descripción y alias» pero no puedo, me dice: «Validation failed: Negative pattern matched: /^\s|[\r\n\t]|\s$/». Soy un usuario confiable en la Wikipedia en español, aquí creo que también lo he demostrado. Si hay que dar un permiso para poder realizar ediciones allí, por favor, démelo. --C. Jonel (talk) 01:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Tu as todos las permisas necessidas. Probablemente es un error technica. Quel página no as permido de completar los datos?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Research article

Hi there, Ymblanter :) My colleague and I have written a research paper about Wikidata and the Jerusalem debate and we refer to some of the discussions that you engaged with. We would love to share it with you, so let me know if you'd like to see a pre-publication copy? My email address is hfordsa at gmail.com. --Hfordsa (talk) 10:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, but I just plainly have no time right now. I will appreciate a reference if it gets available online (before or after the publication).--Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Bot Request

Hello, Could you please take a look to this bot request. Thank you.--ASammour (talk) 18:59, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Bot

Estoy viendo todas las contribuciones de User:Liangent-bot en los cambios recientes. Sin embargo figura con flag de bot... no deberían estar ocultas sus contribuciones? --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Si, Liangent-bot tambien as un flag de bot. No ho comprendo que e se pasado.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Solamente fue ese día, por suerte ya desaparecieron. Gracias por tu respuesta, --LadyInGrey (talk) 17:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Claro, no es un problema.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Вопрос

Здраствуйте уважаемый Ymblanter, один вопрос хочу задать, почему я не могу поставить запрос удаления этого элемента - Q20962028? Где должен нажимать?--6AND5 (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Извините, но мне интересно, почему в таких элементах, нету таких <<кнопок>>, как править или удалить?--6AND5 (talk) 23:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Потому что это редирект. Там нечего править. Можно восстановить, откатив последнюю правку. А кнопка "удалить" там, разумеется, есть, но она доступна только администраторам.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Ymblanter, many thanks for changing my user rights. Best, SlimVirgin (talk) 05:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Sure, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the bot approval - I was thinking of posting here to ask what to do next and you already did it! ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Sure, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

запрос на право администратора переводов

Здравствуйте, коллега! Не могли бы вы взглянуть на мой запрос? --Ochilov (talk) 02:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 06:38, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Translation administrator/HakanIST

Здравствуйте, коллега! не могли бы вы взглянуть на обсуждение выше? Заранее спасибо :) --Ochilov (talk) 07:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Викисловарь и Викиданные

Привет! Слушай, я заметил что Узбекский и Эсперанто Викисловари не работают с интервиками Викиданных. Так задумано? --Ochilov (talk) 08:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Все Викисловари должны работать или не работать одинаково. Я за этим не очень слежу, но, по-моему, Викисловарь - единственный проект, не подключённый к Викиданным, и не очень понятно, как его подключать. Про это были обсуждения, они должны через список проектов находиться.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Окей, спасибо :) --Ochilov (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hsarrazin

Добрый день. Можно попросить взглянуть на вклад user:Hsarrazin, и в частности на вот это вот? Та же проблема минимум для Франс Галль. Очень мало работаю в викиданных и плохо понимаю, как это понимать, то ли бот взбесился, то ли это вручную делается - и, соответственно, нести это к администраторам или пытаться достучаться до участницы. Вообще говоря, склонен рассматривать даты смерти для живых персон как одну из грубейших разновидностей вандализма и в рувики бессрочить за это без особых разговоров. OneLittleMouse (talk) 08:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

В сербской Википедии действительно стояла дата смерти, видимо, вандализм. Я сейчас её убрал. Думаю, бот работает нормально, надо просто подумать, как такие случаи отсеивать. --Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

С Франс Галль данные пришли из французской Википедии, но там пока не могу найти. В любом случае, думаю, это вопрос для общего обсуждения на Project Chat.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

hello Ymblanter , and thank you for correction.

I'm usually very cautious with death dates when the concerned wiki is not of the person's language (i.e. srwiki for an american/swedish/frenc, etc.). This one escaped me ;)

As for France Gall, I did not remember at all this edit, and I certainly did not do it willingly, since I know perfectly well that she is pretty alive (I'm French, as you may know).

I checked the code of the frwiki page, and found that the template "death date" had been used to code the date of her marriage, in order, probably, to indicate her age at that time. Yesterday, I used Pasleim's tool to automatically retrieve dates from Birth and Death date templates ... but I couldn't have anticipated such a devious use of a template :(

Thanks a lot for correcting it, and can you please pass my thanks to the OneLittleMouse. I can understand his/her comment, but cannot write properly to answer. Yours, --Hsarrazin (talk) 14:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Merci, c'est pas un probleme. I think what we should do is to think (and possibly to discuss at the Project Chat) how we generally minimize such cases (automatic or semi-automatic gathering of data which were recently vandalized). I do not have an immediate idea, but may be some could come up with one.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

sometimes, I think that wikidata, in fact, helps to dig out all sorts of errors that were present in wp projects some for months, some for years… in that sense, importing an error on wikidata, and putting it in full view can sometimes be a good thing, by allowing to correct old mistakes :) —— here I think of the Hungarian person, who was considered dead since 2004 by various libraries, whose item was successfully corrected in a few hours, thanks to wikidata ;)

yesterday I caught 5 such edits, one being a real error on arwiki, with a confusion between two homonyms. The death was sourced…, only there was a confusion of persons — only my knowledge of the concerned person made me suspicious of the reality of her death…

I don't have an idea either for catching all vandalism, or even good faith errors… considering the very large number of such data (death dates) everyday, checking sources for everyone of them on every language is simply not feasible :( — great caution is the best tool, but sometimes can be insufficient…

I recently activated Wikidata:ORES/Usage which is a great help to find suspicious edits in main GUI ; moreover, it also works on all wikimedia projects… but it is no help in semi-automated tools like Pasleim's or Magnus's.

--Hsarrazin (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

• И снова, похоже тем же самым по тому же месту... OneLittleMouse (talk) 07:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

  А в чём тут проблема? В немецкой Википедии утверждении о смерти есть, подтверждено источником, с виду не фейк. Если это не так, надо разбираться с источниками, возможно, ставить два утверждения.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

  • По меньшей мере рувики утверждает, что в дальшейшем сообщения о смерти были опровергнуты. Впрочем, да, в любом случае здесь не настолько явно некорректные правки. OneLittleMouse (talk) 09:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Hulp met een paar schilderijen

Hoi Ymblanter, ik ben een heel end gekomen met User:Multichill/SOAP ruwiki monitor, maar de laatste kom ik niet uit. Zou je willen helpen? Multichill (talk) 17:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Wat wil je weten? Alle cellen ingevuld (behalve de laatste als schilderijen nog steeds niet vrij zijn)?--Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Bij deze schilderijen mist of de creator (P170) of de collection (P195). Ik hoop dat deze missende informatie in het Russisch te vinden is. Als de maker anoniem/onbekend is dan kan je anonymous (Q4233718) gebruiken en voor privé verzamelingen hebben we private collection (Q768717). Multichill (talk) 18:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Duidelijk, ga ik doen.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Ik was wellicht niet helemaal duidelijk, de tabel is puur als boodschappenlijstje en deze wordt bijgewerkt door een bot dus niet [20], maar [21][22][23]. Bij de volgende botrun verdwijnen deze schilderijen van het lijstje. Sorry voor de onduidelijkheid. Multichill (talk) 22:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Oke, geen probleem.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Maarten, in Q15918830 de locatie is onbekend. Wat zouden we doen?--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

De locatie mag ook iets zijn waar het schilderij geweest is. Daar kunnen we dan weer qualifiers aan hangen voor de periode. Doen we bijvoorbeeld ook bij schilderijen die vernietigd zijn. Is zoiets mogelijk in dit geval? Multichill (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Ze zeggen dat het schilderij is alleen maar bekend omdat iemand die had genoemd. Misschien zouden we dit "fictitious painting" hernoemen of zoiets.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Ik heb alles gedaan, de locatie van de resterende stukken is onbekend.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Bedankt voor de hulp! Multichill (talk) 12:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Graag gedaan, en ik heb die nog steeds op mijn volglijst.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Nieuwe gebruiker checken

Hoi Ymblanter, Special:Contributions/Abc82 zag ik opeens heel veel van in m'n volglijst. Deze gebruikers is voor onbepaalde tijd geblokkeerd op de Russiche Wikipedia. Kan jij eens kijken of de bewerkingen hier een beetje kloppen? Alles is in het Russisch dus ik kan er niet zoveel mee. Alvast bedankt, Multichill (talk) 19:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Sommige kloppen wel, sommige zijn voor mij te zwaar. We zouden iemand vragen die Russisch spreekt en dat wel kan verstaan.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

@Putnik:, Сергей, не можете посмотреть недавний вклад этого заблокированного в Русской Википедии юзера (Special:Contributions/Abc82)? Он добавляет какие-то описания, которые я не могу понять, но я плохо знаком с соответствующей терминологией, не могу разобраться, имеет ли это смысл. Заранее спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Не знаю, что сказать. С одной стороны, правки явно добросовестные, с другой — участник иногда даёт элементам очень неоднозначные определения, явно взятые из головы. Такое было и в Википедии, что в итоге по сумме вклада и привело его к блокировке. —putnik 01:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Большие спасибо, видимо, будем смотреть дальше.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Просьба

Добрый день, Ярослав! Не могли бы посмотреть мою заявку? Игорь Темиров (talk) 10:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 10:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Спасибо! Игорь Темиров (talk) 11:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Conjunto Lacustre/lacustre

Gracias por el trabajo. Un saludo19Tarrestnom65 (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

De nada.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi there, We just had a discussion about the deletion of Q22712574, it seems that you guys are just deleting things with no discussion. mike

I do not quite see what the discussion should be about, since it pretty clearly does not satisfy our notability policy. However, if you could point to the existing discussion, it would be helpful.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Topic:Sz9nrls00un2ucre see here, basically I would like to include the software categories from the fsf directory here in wikidata. I am working on importing all those projects as well. The category of internationalization text converters should be clearly notable. Mdupont (talk) 13:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I am afraid you would need to take it to the Project Chat. I do not see how a category can be notable if it does not exist in any on our projects.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I just find it strange that you delete things with no discussion. "Our project", well it is part of my project inside "our project", which is free software. Mdupont (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

We have notability policy, which I use when I decide whether an item should or should not be deleted.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

This was a one test item I added, you are deleting it with no discussion. I have raised this as you suggested with the project Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Import_of_Free_Software_Directory_categories Mdupont (talk) 10:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Greg Joy и Грег Джой, статьи о разных персонах

23 февраля 2014 г. вы откатили мою правку викиданных, которая касалась легкоатлета Грега Джоя, родившегося в США в 1956 году и музыканта Грега Джоя, родившегося в Канаде в 1954 году. Ещё раз прошу обратить внимание, что это не один и тот же человек. — Reefr (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Я её откатил, так как вы убрали русскую статью, а новый элемент Викиданных под неё не создали. Такие случаи отлавливает бот, и я их обрабатывал, вероятно, ошибся в данном случае. Пожалуйста, заведите отдельный элемент Викиданных для музыканта. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

How can you delete a whole entity because I made a editing mistake?

That does not seem fair or right. Q20018039 was already a entity and I made a mistake in the edit... There was no reason to delete it completely. Please restore ASAP. Thanks

I restored it, but it does not seem to satisfy our notability policy. in particular, the only Wikipedia article about it was deleted, and the element is not used for structural needs. please make sure it satisfies the notability policy, otherwise it will be deleted again.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Админзаявка

Привет! Закрой мою заявку плиз. Может ещё подам в сентябре, а пока видно что не прохожу :) --Lingveno (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Request for bot flag

Hi, can you offer this case for me [24]. Thanks. Alphama (talk) 08:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

It should stay open for several days.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

user page

thanks for the autoconfirm, could you please delete my user page so the meta flows through unified? looks better than the redirect, thanks. Slowking4 (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Deleted items

Hi, Ymblanter! I saw in my watchlist you deleted items Q20925284 and Q20925285. Is there a way in Wikidata to know which concept an item was related to... after its deletion? ('Spanish writer' aside) Their name, at least? I would like to figure out the "level of notability" here (I don't even know if I created them or not). Regards and thanks for your edits! Strakhov (talk) 18:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

The first one was Miguel Ángel Pertierra, the second one - Paco Quevedo, both were deleted some time ago from the Spanish Wikipedia.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

A couple of ufo-journalists, I believe they were. Not a huge loss. Thanks! Strakhov (talk) 11:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

If they are in any way needed for structural integrity of Wikidata, do not hesitate to ask me restoring them.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Using these guys as a source for anything would be a longshot. They would be hardly describable using reliable sources too. But thanks anyways, I copy that. Strakhov (talk) 11:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#Buggy edits with ru:Википедия:WE-Framework

Приглашаю Вас принять участие (либо привлечь других компетентных участников) в обсуждении, влияющем на точность указания дат в сотнях тысяч статей рувики. Чем раньше будет понятно, кто прав, тем быстрее удастся устранить ошибки с обеих сторон. Заранее спасибо, Sealle (talk) 10:38, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Простите, я из принципиальных соображений не предпринимаю никаких действий, связанных с русской Википедией. Это не мой проект, там достаточно администраторов и простых участников, которые всё знают лучше меня, вот пусть они и наводят порядок, если там что-то не работает.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Принято, впредь буду обращаться к более ответственным участникам, не ставящим личные интересы выше интересов проекта. Sealle (talk) 11:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Да, Вы меня этим очень обяжете.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

MediaWiki talk:Gadget-autoEdit.js

Добрый день! Можете, пожалуйста, обновить, список описаний для autoEdit для украинского языка? Там часть названий неправильно переведены (в частности, для категории), и многие отсутсвуют. К сожалению, не знаю, к кому ещё обратиться, так как вы единственный администратор, у которого родной язык кириллический. Спасибо! — NickK (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Могу, конечно, если Вы мне ясно напишете, что надо сделать. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Спасибо, но уже сделали. Там на странице запрос был, но его уже закрыли, так что уже неактуально — NickK (talk) 21:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Замечательно.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Re-nomination

Hello.When can I re-nominate myself?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Formally, you can do it now. If you want to succeed, I would say wait at least a year and try taking into account constructive comments they made during this discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

"Manaus (Q40236)":

The part that showcase Manaus area, is right this information [11 401 060 0000]?

--WikiUser22222 (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

I have no idea. Is there any reason you are asking me?--Ymblanter (talk) 15:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

KML

Hi Ymblanter, I see from your userpage that you understand Russian. Would you be able to assist in setting up Template:Attached KML (Q6690822) and Module:Attached KML (Q26689774) on ruwiki? That way another wikipedia will also be able to make use of KML files through the KML file (P3096) property (you supported the proposal for this property a few weeks ago [25]). There are instructions in English at w:en:Module:Attached_KML#Set_up_on_another_wiki. Thanks, Evad37 [talk] 03:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

I do not edit ruwiki as a matter of principle. My apologies that I can not help this time. You can ask here: Wikidata:Форум--Ymblanter (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

The Image

Hello.See here --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Bot problem

Hi Ymblanter,

It seems it might have been you who approved it in the first place. Can you have a look at Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#Please_block_User:EloBot. The bot adds countless useless statements on dead and inactive players.
--- Jura 06:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, it is obviously on my watchlist. I do not see the consensus for blocking the bot, and the operator seems to be responsive. I think you just need to continue discussing.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

I think it's clear that there is no consensus for adding the defective entries from the dump. The operator just limits himself to saying it's in the dump .. so this isn't helpful. If it's such a problem to sort this out, maybe we need to check all these questions before the bot is approved.
--- Jura 06:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

I ask every time the community to ask the questions before approval, and give enough time, even a second notice. But most bot tasks di not any questions at all. I can only recollect one or two which got any opposition but still got approved after an extended discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

I think we should expect most operators to be careful about what they do and most of the time this works out. To me it seems obvious that 50 ratings on a dead person shouldn't be added, imagine we'd assume that every operator adds statements in an indiscriminate way. I don't see how the edits are covered by your approval. Even FIDE doesn't consider them valid ratings.
--- Jura 06:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

It's really odd that you approved this. If it would just add pointless statements to chess players, I suppose it wouldn't matter, but there are people that happened to play chess as well and these items now get flooded.
--- Jura 11:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

User:Jura1, what's the discrimination of the dead players? --Infovarius (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hermitage

Hi Yaroslav, I imported the remaining Hermitage paintings to Wikidata. The total number went from around 3100 to around 5100 paintings. Quite a few paintings still need to be connected with the painter. At User:Multichill/Hermitage missing painter you'll find an overview. Could use some help with connecting the paintings to the right painters (or anonymous (Q4233718)) in case you're interested. Multichill (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I am working on it every day, and actually the main time consumption was to upload the paintings. Great that you have done that, I can now concentrate on the creator property.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

I see however that here that was no image, so I conclude that you created items for all paintings in the Hermitage, but not imported images. Anyway, I will continue working on them.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

I could upload the images too if you like. I did that for other collections too. It takes quite a while, but it's fully automatic (the bot also updates the Wikidata item). Are all the works in the public domain or do I need to skip some of them? Multichill (talk) 19:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

There is a small quantity which are not in public domain (the author not yet dead for 70 years). The pages have the death year of the author (you can safely skip the cases where this date is not present), but I do not know whether it could be read by a bot. It would be great if you could upload the files.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

I clicked through the collection and I also found a couple of work that are not in the public domain yet. Once inception (P571) and/or the creator (P170) is set with date of death (P570) on the painter, a bot easily make an assessment to upload an image or not.

I will implement this at some point in the future, just don't know when yet. Multichill (talk) 20:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Jcb on Commons

Hoi Yaroslav, it feels a Déjà vu, right? I already have Commons:Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship 4) on my watchlist because I think it's a matter of time before he gets into another desysop procedure. Multichill (talk) 09:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, and I will be around to vote for the desysop. I am really pissed off this time, and limited for the time being all my contributions to Commons to the file namespace. Not so much by Jcb, who was predictable, but by the others saying that it is entirely my fault that he acted like a bot and did not even look what the problem was.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:25, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Прошу удалить страницу-дубликат

Уважаемый Ymblanter! Мною по неосмотрительности создана страница Travis Scott (рэпер), которая является дубликатом уже существующей страницы Трэвис Скотт. Не могли бы Вы удалить мною созданный дубликат Travis Scott (рэпер)? Заранее огромное спасибо! Впредь обещаю быть более внимательным. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 21:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Linking to redirects

I saw your comment about linking to articles where you note that we cannot link to the same Wikipedia article from two different Wikidata items. I'm hoping you know why.

I'd like to accomplish the linking when a sensible redirect exists. For example, on enwp, en:Theologian is a redirect to en:Theology - we deal with both (closely related) topics in the same article. When an article on a theologian has an infobox, I'd like to be able to use en:Module:WikidataIB to fetch their occupation from Wikidata and link it to the enwp article that covers that occupation, so I'd want to create a link to [[theologian]] (which would of course take the reader to Theology). That's easy to make in Lua, but the value of the occupation property on Wikidata would be 'theologian' and the software prevents me from directly making the link to en:Theologian, because it's a redirect. I've been able to make a temporary fix by making the enwp redirect into an article for one minute, and meanwhile making the Wikidata link, but I shouldn't have to do that for every occupation redirect that we have pointing to the article on the topic itself, surely?

Is there a rational reason for preventing Wikidata from making links to redirects, when such functionality is demonstrably useful as I've outlined above? --RexxS (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

It was possible until some time ago, and this is why we still have redirect links somewhere. I do not think it is now possible unless you create an article on purpose, make a Wikidata item, and then turn it into a redirect (without moving).--Ymblanter (talk) 15:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

(Sorry for interruption) Some are arguing that redirects should not be presented as sitelinks at all. Look, e.g., RFC:Links to redirects with possibilities or RFC:A need for a resolution regarding article moves and redirects. --Infovarius (talk) 15:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Indeed, even when they are technically feasible they likely are not notable for Wikidata.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Help with deleting now-empty item

The information in

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6419491

has been merged into

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11981015

where the information really belongs.

I would appreciate if you could you help, by deleting the now-empty item

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6419491

Thanks, Lklundin (talk) 22:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

I now merged the two items properly, so that one became a redirect.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I have enabled the 'Merge' gadget, so I can perform future merges correctly myself. Thanks for the explanation. Lklundin (talk) 08:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Help with re-importing data from (English) Wikipedia

Hello Ymblanter,

Since you were so helpful with my previous question, I wonder if you could help me with another one.

I did some work on a Wikipedia article, which points to Q28401507, e.g. adding coordinates and some sources.

Is there a way to trigger wikidata to automatically reimport its information on these data from the Wikipedia article?

Thanks, Lklundin (talk) 11:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

I believe it will be pick up by bot at some point (WD:Project Chat would be a good place to ask for details), but I am not aware of any way to speed it up except for asking the bot owner(s) or to transfer manually.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Images

Dear Ymblanter,

I am one of our admins, though I am less actively involved in our community and functions than I would like to believe. I am however highly involved in Wikipedia and work on moving images from Wikidata to wikipedia in 18 Wikipedia languages [26]. I would like to ask if you would review and discuss a proposal with me. I am looking for an experienced editor who can propose the idea to the community.

The Dutch Wikipedia, where I am bureaucrat, is currently discussing a pilot to introduce Wikidata images automatically to templates. I think this is a good idea. Other Wikipedias already do this, for example the Norwegian, Swedish and Russian. However I have noticed that Wikidata images are not always suitable for usage on Wikipedia without added explanation. For example, images on artists are often their work, instead of an image of the person. Images on butterflies are often bundled images with many butterflies [27]. As such it is hard to use these images automatically on Wikipedia, where they would be displayed as main image, without further explanation.

I would like to propose, if this already exists please correct me, to split the images section into two. "Main image" should be reserved for images that explain the subject without further explanation, and something like "image" can have all other images. Feel free to change these names as needed.

This way Wikidata can become more usefull for Wikipedia. If Wikidata is used as standard on Wikipedia we can get tens of thousands of editors who come to Wikidata.

I would like to ask your opinion on the subject, and if you agree with me, would like to ask if you can propose this to the Wikidata community. I understand it will take alot of work. However, in the long run, I believe it is needed and it can greatly benefit Wikidata.

I look forward to your response.

Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 19:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Preliminarily, it makes sense. One can just propose a new property, which is not really a lot of work. Usually new property discussions draw some useful feedback, so that even if the property does not get consensus to be approved, still a good solution often can be proposed.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Astrakhan (Q3927)

I can't understand why you find it necessary to remove the collage of Astrakhan? I have seen several towns with more than one image, and as we on da wiki fetch the image directly from wd, and the collage gives more allround info on Astrakhan, and btw. other towns too, I prefer the collage. PerV (talk) 17:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

@PerV: To be honest, I hate collages. It might be a good idea to check what we should have for images in such items, opening a topic at WD:Project Chat.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

@Ymblanter:Why should I chek for another image, I had already found one image, this image you deleted! PerV (talk) 21:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

@PerV: I do not suggest you to check for another image, there is an image already there anyway. What I suggest is to open a discussion what type of images do we need in items in general.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Does wd have a general policy, that wd don't have collages on towns? If not I don't see any reason why I should raise a general discussion about use of images because you hate collages! PerV (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Because Wikidata is not a trash can. There was already one image in the item.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Please show me a general policy, that wd don't have more than one image on a town? You are allowed to disagree with me, your even allowed to "hate collages" but do you base your deletion on a general policy or on your point of view? PerV (talk) 22:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

There is no policy which says anything about files. There is, in particular, no policy which says there could not be 10000 images in the same item. It does not mean we should allow 10000 images.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Why do you choose to argume against 10000 images, I didn't suggest 10000 images. But as you say, you "hate" one image, and delete it. I think that is editing on the basis of point of view, and not compatible with the spirit of Wikipedia. I think you should reenter the image and leave it, or prove it's against the general policy on wd. PerV (talk) 22:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

I do not think you get the point. The policy has never been discussed. It is not that there is a policy somewhere which allows two images, or one image, or 10000 images. It needs to be made. I am not going to return the image before this discussion has happened. The position "Either show me a policy why this is not allowed, or I do it" is not constructive.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

I don't know why you argume agaist something I didn't say, that is not constructive, I didn't write about 10.000 images and I didn't say "or I do it". But I give up, you hate a picture, and you delete it, this is your choice. I think it's wrong! PerV (talk) 23:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

I did not delete it, the picture is still on Commons and can be used in every Wikimedia project if the editors of that project have no objection. However, I feel that if the picture is used on Wikidata, a discussion should have been held.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Просьба

Здравствуйте. Прошу Заблокировать участника Hhhggg. В настоящее время он бессрочно заблокирован в Русской Википедии, но периодически пытается оказать влияние на выборы администраторов. Особо показателен его сегодняшний вклад в Викидата[28]. --Petrov Victor (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Спасибо. --Petrov Victor (talk) 03:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

The strategy process

There's really few comments on the talk page. Do you think the Wikidata community is aware of the discussion? Do you know ways to make it more visible? SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 22:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@SGrabarczuk (WMF): Hi Szymon. I participated in the previous (2008?) discussion, and, I am afraid, it was a mistake to keep it now on the projects. It is just no critical mass even on the English Wikipedia, the largest project, to start a real discussion, not just a set of opinions. I am active on three projects (English Wikipedia, Russian Wikivoyage, and Wikidata), I participated in all three discussions (actually, the least in Wikidata), I also have the Meta page on my watchlist, and, to be honest, your efforts is the first time I got an impression anybody even reads what we write there. At the same time, on the Wikimedia Conference they are discussing strategy, which of course creates a clear impression that nobody listens to individual contributors. Short conclusion - wrong format, though I would not know what the right format would be.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

If we are talking about the existing discussion, it can be possibly still saved if one makes one more announcement on the project chat and at the same time tries to actively support the discussion, may be even to contact some users individually.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

A few messages were posted on the prooject chat, on the weekly summary #253, there's the central notice. I don't know where's the golden mean: how to keep people informed and avoid spam. As for the individual contact: whom to contact? SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

For the individual contact, Denny is an obvious candidate who has a lot of ideas. There is some danger he could completely dominate the discussion, but it is currently better than having no discussion at all. Other candidates are active users (Project Chat posters and active admins) who have not just been in Berlin for Wikimedia conference - those who have been there already discussed things and will have little incentive to put things in writing.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

I am indeed always very careful in joining strategy discussions, partly due to the issues mentioned by Ymblanter. I would like to let the other participants more space for that. Also, I already have a quite strong opinion on the future of Wikimedia :) --Denny (talk) 17:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Infinite IP block

Hi Ymblanter. I'm currently checking the infinitely blocked IPs, and came to the conclusion that Special:Contributions/2003:66:8F3D:E785:222:4DFF:FEAF:FA63 should probably be unblocked. In blocking it you were certainly correct back then, but this most likely dynamic IP (DTAG does not give static IPs to non-business customers) was only used during a period of five days, more than half a year ago now. I guess we should unblock this IP. In case the bot continues to work logged off using this IP, it could be identified in unpatrolled edits (which I patrol on a regular basis) soon. Any objections? --YMS (talk) 14:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

No objections, I probably thought the bot owner would identify themselves, but apparently this did not happen.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Question

Hello Ymblanter: can you force "Alamannia" to link also to "Alamannia" in the German wiki? The latter is a redirect to their article Alamannen, but because of that redirect (I think) the English article Alamannia has no German link, which is quite inconvenient. Thank you. 207.93.13.150 17:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

No, this is not technically possible.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Possible paintings in ruwki, plwiki and ukwiki

Yaroslav, if you have some time on your hands, maybe you could take a look at these zero-statement items rounded up by Maarten? There are lots of paintings in there and I gave the ones with "portrait" in the title an instance of painting and the icons I made instance of icon, but the altars might be sculptures. These were rounded up from subcategories of paintings with Petscan. If you just add instance of painting or icon then Maarten's other bots will resort them overnight into other lists. Hope you can help: Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Possible paintings Jane023 (talk) 12:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes, the page is on my watchlist, and I am slowly going through it. I will try to see over the weekend whether I can dedicate some time and go through all Russian and Ukrainian items (Polish is more tricky and has a lower priority for me).--Ymblanter (talk) 14:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Заблокирование

Здравствуйте можете заблокировать меня на срок от 1 до 2 недель. Я очень привязался к Викиданным и не могу оторваться. ToJack (talk • contribs • logs) 17:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Нет, пожалуйста, решите эту проблему другим способом.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Анализ действий участника

Здравствуйте. Всё нормально с этой правкой? По моему "итог" неоднозначен и наверное участник не имел право на это, кроме варианта снятиии заявки. Я бы откатил давая ему знать об этом, но так как чуть ранее он уже возмущался на моей СО про мою интервенцию в том обсуждении, пожалуй оставлю другим выбор нужного действия после анализа этой правки. --XXN, 11:34, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Нет, это для бюрократов. Сейчас ему напишу.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Ещё материал для анализа (по свежее): [29], en:Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Winterysteppe. Жаль что сокмастеров и их клонов не блокируют глобально. --XXN, 17:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Маска Библиотеки Конгресса

URL-маску в коде LCNAF нужно заменить на http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/$1. Мне не даёт поправить. Дитмар (talk) 03:16, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

@Дитмар:, Я заменю, но напишите, пожалуйста, какую, там три.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Ymblanter, самую первую, которая называется "маска URL". Дитмар (talk) 08:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Благодарю. Дитмар (talk) 08:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Die link was stuk

Dus ik heb de oude formatter weer teruggezet. Die Duitse trol begint trouwens wel erg vervelend te worden. Multichill (talk) 21:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Ja, dank je wel. Ik vormoed de IP range zal worden geblokkeerd, maar ik heb geen idee hoe dat moet.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Bot

Hello, Could you please take a look in this bot request. I would like to start adding & fixing label if there is no objection. Thank you. Aftabuzzaman (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC) Aftabuzzaman (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Q10380562

Could you please reinstate Tereza Cristina Corrêa da Costa Dias (Q10380562) — this was a member of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, and I'm happy to add any missing references (http://www.camara.gov.br/internet/deputado/Dep_Detalhe.asp?id=5830732) --Oravrattas (talk) 19:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I see that the version before deletion did have a sourced reference for this person being a national legislator, so I'm wondering why this was deleted? --Oravrattas (talk) 20:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Because the article on the Portuguese Wikipedia was deleted as non-notable. I assumed they know better.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Question regarding the bot approval

Hi, I got Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Revibot 2 approval from you as "creating item as AutoList and WD item creator", but as both of them were migrated to PetScan and I was not comfortable using PetScan (way too complex for me), I started using Pywikibot, to do same thing. Do you think new bot request for that is needed or the RfBot linked is sufficient? Thanks! — regards, Revi 08:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

I would may be submit a new request. This is a new code, just to make sure everything is fine and running smoothly.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

done! — regards, Revi 16:03, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, we will be waiting for a couple of days at least (might be more as I am currently traveling).--Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Q5705

Please consider my request at Talk:Q5705.Hugopako (talk) 16:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

nl:Stol -> en:Stollen

Hi Ymblanter! I removed nl:Stol for a reason: currently, on nl.wiki, nl:Stol links in the language list to en:Stollen while it should link to en:Kerststol, since Stollen is a German thing, not quite the same as the Dutch (Kerst)stol. PPP (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

@PPP:, but in this case you should have linked it to en:Kerststol, I found it in the list of unlinked items.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:10, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Ajuda

Olá amigo estou tentando construir uma entidade chamada a Israel Lucas Góis ele é um investidor muito conhecido aqui no Brasil o grande problema é que toda vez que cria uma entidade um administrador chamado Pasleim, excluir a página acabei brigando com ele e ele está me perseguindo não deixando o efetuar nada, Você poderia por favor me ajudar a criar essa entidade GRUPO CALIMA DIESEL (talk) 03:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Mira Wikidata:Notability, esta página debe ajudar.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Double check

Please double-check Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/TohaomgBot. There is a problem with the English labels. Not really sure about the others.
--- Jura 14:09, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Создание свойства

Коллега! Не могли бы создать свойство: Специальное звание. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Свойство нельзя просто так взять и создать. Есть специальные страницы для обсуждения создания свойств типа этой (есть более специализированные). Там надо предложить свойство к созданию, объяснить, какой будет формат, и после обсуждения свойство либо создадут, либо предложат, как лучше решить задачу другими способами.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

У меня плохо с аглицким. Не могли бы помочь? Я в этой карточке ничего понять не могу, где чего заполнять. Да и если разберусь, то смогу написать только на русском. Смысл в том, что Специальное звание - звание в правоохранительных органах СССР и России. Мотивация: Отличается от воинского звания и необходимо для указания, например, у министров внутренних дел, их заместителей, председателя Следственного комитета, генеральрого прокурора (там бы еще и классный чин забить (Специальное звание или классный чин), но это вообще слишком сложно) и т.д. В обсуждении приму участие с помощью гугл переводчика. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 20:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Я прошу прощения, но я на этой неделе не могу совсем. Если на следующей ещё будет актуально, могу посмотреть. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

До следующей недели подождет. Надо будет напомнить или нет?--Kolchak1923 (talk) 21:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Боюсь, да, я сейчас в таком режиме, что за два дня всё забываю полностью.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Следующая неделя наступила. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 20:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Ну, хорошо, чтобы предложить свойство к созданию, надо заполнить табличку, которую я скопировал ниже. В ней не обязательно заполнять все графы, но нужно указать как минимум тип и пример.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:34, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Так в этом-то и проблема. Во-первых, когда я ее открываю для правки мне не понятно где и что заполнять. Во-вторых, что такое тип, и какой пример нужен. Такой шаблон я и сам сделал в тот же день, а вот с остальным я и обратился за помощью к Вам. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 06:58, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Вот тут: Property talk:P410 есть заполненная табличка для воинского звания. Тип Вам, наверное, нужне тот же - item. Represents - есть элемент для специального звания? Пример - нужно найти элемент для кого-то, у кого есть какое-то специальное звание, и показать, как ему соответствует элемент Викиданных с этим званием. Посмотрите, может, там ещё что-то полезное есть. --Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Коллега! Я не могу понять куда чего писать. В какой графе надо писать тип, в какой элемент и еще где дается описание. Если напишу по-русски, поймут? --Kolchak1923 (talk) 07:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Пишите по-русски, я переведу. Тип в графе datatype, описание вроде как само не нужно, можно написать под таблицей. --Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Надеюсь я правильно заполнил... --Kolchak1923 (talk) 10:47, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Спасибо. У Чайки, Колоколçева и Бастрыкина надо этот чин прописать. Например, Чайка - условно говоря, советник юстиции 1 ранга - должен быть элемент "советник юстиции 1 ранга", и на него надо дать ссылку. (Не уверен, что можно объдинять специальное звание и классный чин в одном свойстве, но это при обсуждении в клюбом случае укажут).--Ymblanter (talk) 16:28, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Так? --Kolchak1923 (talk) 18:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Я чуть поправил, можно добавлять сюда: Wikidata:Property proposal/Person#Careers--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Спасибо за помощь, добавил. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 19:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Только почему-то текст на основной странице не появился. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Нашел. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 20:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Я перенёс на той же странице в другой раздел.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Еще раз спасибо. Без Вашей помощи я, несмотря на 9-летний стаж в Вики, еще долго бы разбирался что, куда и как. Все очень сложно что-то... --Kolchak1923 (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Пока всё ещё только началось.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Это Вы про обсуждение, а я про заполнение заявки. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 20:47, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Коллега, а сколько длится обсуждение минимум? Неделя, месяц? Видел они и годами идут. Каких-то сроков не нашел. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 18:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Раньше недели точно никто ничего создавать не будет, скорее пара недель или месяц. Годами они идут, если есть возражения. Создавать точно буду не я, ближе к делу я посмотрю, какая там ситуация, может быть, можно будет попросить кого-нибудь на общем форуме.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Коллега! Номинацию перевели в разряд Готово и появилось предложение создать. Это значит, что можно создать свойство? Если да, то попросите кого-то, если сами не хотите этим заниматься. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 06:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

George Green

Hello.
May I ask you (or a talk page stalker) to watch the entity and rollback disruption like [30]? Some writers for Wikidata are not readers of Commons. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

I added it to the watchlist (though, admittedly, my Wikidata watchlist is not as efficient as in other projects, I do not check all the entries). Do you know if a portrait of this guy exists at all?--Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Know nothing about such a portrait. You can try to ask physicists from Nottingham. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the stupidity persists with no requested intervention occurring. Has Wikidata any interest groups (on math, physics, or images at very least) which could combat it effectively? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

This should prevent it. Multichill (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

@Multichill: nice try, but yet fail. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:25, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Disruption from an IPv6

Hello.
By chance noted the IPv6 injecting stuff into particle physics – some additions look legitimate, but overall seems to be a college student eager to correct professors. Can you look after it? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Those edits of the IP which I can check easily seem good to me.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Q43101 perhaps? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

This is a good point, but I still do not think they are editing disruptively - they might have missed that, and a simple talk page message could help.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Ярослав, Вы действительно считаете эти игры в матрёшки полезным вкладом? На Викиданных реально принято лепить part of (P361) по поводу и без? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:38, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Нет, ничего особенно полезного тут нет, но не блокировать же из-за этого весь диапазон.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Ask a few questions

Happy new year,Ymblanter.I want to ask you a few questions：

1. I am currently reading the page under this category.I want to know how What are the points that are important or commonly used in this category?If I want to practice the patrol licensing of document,how I can do?
2. I want to help share the work of SWAT now.But when I join the #cvn-sw channel,I find that I don't understand the language in the link myself.So how can I do for this?

That all,thanks.Catherine Laurence 15:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. I am sorry but I am completely incompetent to answer either question (the category does not exist, but I would not be able rto answer this even if I could access the pages).--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

why?Catherine Laurence 16:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Because I do not know what SWAT is and never heard about patrol licensing of documents--Ymblanter (talk) 16:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry this is my problem,The SWAT should be SWMT.The patrol licensing of documents shoud be License review.I confused them.Catherine Laurence 16:28, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

I am not active in SWMT, but why do not you ask them there on Meta? About the license review, I have never done that.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Because I notice that you are a global rollbacker and sysop in commons.So I think you are familiar with the license review and SWMT work.Sorry,I am bothering you.Catherine Laurence 17:18, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

No problem. No, I am really not familiar with either. Try asking on Meta.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Tartu

Hi! Why did you revert? In last edit summary I accidently missed two digits: coat of arms image "Tartu coat of arms.svg" matches Q42307965 (the municipality), not Q4230796. Item Q13972 is about settlements, settlements in Estonia generally don't have coats of arms. Other than, I've explaiend and discussed my edits, I don't think there is reason to consider it vandalism. 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:C8E6:1846:4DC0:EFDA 08:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

You have such a long record of unconstructive edit-warring that for the next year you will have to explain your edits first at the talk page and hope that someone would add them to the item.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Previously some coextensive municipalities and settlements in Estonia were combined into one item. Separate items were introduced after municipal reform in 2017. For the most part I've been trying clear up relevant statements over time. Then there are these semi-automatic infobox data imports where users often don't check what exactly they import. Again, I've trying to clean this up in cases where Wikipedias don't have separate articles about settlement and municipality, or where infobox parameter and Wikidata property don't match well or when Wikipedia data is obviously erroneous. I've also written some comments to importers so that they could be more careful and there was less of putting things back and forth. I've been asked to explain some things for a few times and then I have explained. These explanations related to municipality/settlement data haven't been contested on talk pages really. So I wouldn't call my conduct as "unconstructive" or "edit-warring". 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:C8E6:1846:4DC0:EFDA 09:09, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Since I can not foresee how you can convince me that this was constructive the best avenue for the further discussion is probably the Project Chat.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Well, it's pretty much as the edit summary says. Sorry, I missed another character from link to property head of government (P6). The municipality has head of government. Item about municipality is Q42307965, not Q13972. This head of goverment value had been moved to municipality item earlier. The situation with Tartu being in Estonia since 1918 and Q2174038 not being about country has been explained at Talk:Q2174038 previously. I'm not exactly sure if Infovarius forgot this discussion, but generally they didn't contest my explanation nor did they propose another way to clear this up (current use of statements is inconsistent and misleading). I used statement is subject of (P805) qualifiers in order to clear up what overlapping time ranges are about. If this isn't clear enough then can you suggest another way to make this more clear? What exactly is unclear about my explanation or might seem unconstructive, that should be discussed in project chat? Currently this situation still seems more like a misunderstanding to me. 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:E185:E4E9:EAB1:6582 12:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

If it looks like misunderstanding you should have discussed before mass-reverting other users.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

I didn't intend to miss characters from links to Wikidata entities and produce confusion this way (this caused misunderstanding in the first place, right?). Other than that, changes had been discussed. I think it was straightforward enough to use edit summary to simply remind of this previous discussion on Interwar Estonia. I also previously provided further explanations at Talk:Q13972 and User talk:Infovarius#Valga on municipality/settlement difference. I also already left a comment to another user 3 days ago about what's the issue with their infobox data imports (they haven't replied nor otherwise contested my assessment so far). 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:E185:E4E9:EAB1:6582 12:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

I am not sure what characters you are talking about. If I look at the diff I provided, I see Urmas Klaas on the left and I see no Urmas Klaas on the right. This is removal of information. I see no occupation on the left and I see occupation on the right. This is POV. I am perfectly fine if there is nothing to discussed. The page is semi-protected for a year, and if everybody is happy with the protection, I do not see any issues.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

In edit summaries I accidently missed digit "5" from the end of link Q42307965 and I accidently provided a red link Propety:P6.

As already explained above, "Urmas Klaas" was not removed, instead this statement had been moved to appropriate item Q42307965. There wasn't "occupation" on the left because I added it in order to make things more straightforward and clear. You mean POV like not neutral? The concept that Baltic states were occupied is quite widely accepted as descirbed at en:State continuity of the Baltic states (earlier referenced at Talk:Q2174038). Presenting it the way that Estonia didn't exist during occupation and ignoring state continuity however clearly isn't neutral. As previosly noted in this other discussion, history is quite complex and possibly something else needs to be clarified, but I'm not quite sure what and if there is a good way to do it on this platform.

Well, I'm clearly not happy with the current situation and it doesn't seem justified (or at least noone hasn't tried to make the case that current use of statements is justified).

2001:7D0:81F7:B580:E185:E4E9:EAB1:6582 13:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Protecting Palomar Mountain Observatory (Q191684)?

Thanks for blocking 195.13.182.184. Unfortunately, the vandalism seems to be continuing, and from different IP addresses. Could you consider protecting Palomar Mountain Observatory (Q191684) please (and maybe also the other items that have been vandalised by this anon). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:05, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Почему вандализм?

За что удалили мои изменения? И вообще, что это за изменения? Где тут вандализм?

Я удалил не за вандализм, а как элементы, не имеющие значимости.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Rehman

Hi there. Would you mind undeleting my local userpage please? I intend on keeping a local page for categorisation. Many thanks! Rehman 06:44, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks! That was quick. Rehman 07:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello again Ymblanter. A quick random question. I am working on building a wikidata infobox on enwiki which supports a series of power station types. And I am finding it difficult to get hold of an item with completely full data as per the infobox requirements, which also has specific complex criteria for testing (for example, 2 operational gen units with different capacities, 2 units under const. with different capacities, and 2 units decommissioned which has different capacities, to mention a few).

Is it allowed to create a dummy item on Wikidata (i.e. "Sample Wikidata Power Station") for testing? Or do you recommend an alternative option? Rehman 03:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Would a sandbox within your userspace work? An item for teting may be amenable for speedy deletion (though there might pass a lot of time before someone finds it).--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, Ymblanter. It seems like we don't need that dummy item after all. Happy editing, Rehman 23:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Sure, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Откатывающий

Здраствуйте! Я подал заявку на права откатывающего. Не могли бы Вы подвести итог там? Я не очень владею английским, поэтому напишу здесь на русском причину: Я активный пользователь украинской Википедии и знаю вандалов оттуда, которые добрались и до Викиданых. Буду очень Вам благодарен!--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 14:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Да, я вчера уже начал смотреть Ваш вклад, но я пока не вижу там откатов вандалисма в Викиданных. Не могли бы Вы мне показать пару примеров? Спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Простите, что с задержкой. Посмотрите вклад участника Io pan. Я отменял его правки не просто нажимав "отменить", а делал все вручную. Также там сказано, что достаточно иметь опыт с борьбой против вандализма в других проэктах Викимедиа, а в укрвики я достаточно часто этим занимаюсь и имею там флаг откатывающего. С уважением, Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 20:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо, я присвоил флаг.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Большое спасибо!--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 20:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

page name

Hi there. Would you mind undeleting my page (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q61977801) please? I intend on keeping a local page for categorisation. Many thanks!

I do not think it satisfies our notability criteria.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Гитлер

Здраствуйте! Можете заблокировать User:107.0.37.47? Много вандальных правок в элементе про Гитлера, другие правки еще не смотрел.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:18, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! И еще User: 5.29.56.149 можно? Пока только 3 правки, но сомневаюсь, что он на этом остановится.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 15:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! И user:81.0.15.248 тоже нужно. Он добавил описания на испанском "нещасныф человек" и добавил принцу Непала "заслуженый за наркоторговлю" и еще много чего.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! Есть еще User:GregFinleyPR. Неприйнятное имя пользователя (см. элемент Финли, Грег).--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 21:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Нет, с этим я не буду разбираться, это слишком много сил надо.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Понимаю) Нашел еще User:200.127.77.27. Но вот у него 2 правки и все вандальные. Поэтому не знаю, стоит ли блокировать. И сразу же вопрос: сколько должно быть вандальных правок для блокировки?--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 21:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Этого заблокировал. Общих правил тут нет, иногда можно и за одну вандальную праввку блокировать, если грубые нарушения и недавно. Если есть сомнения, можно предупредить. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! В таком случаи можна и User:190.53.39.52 заблокировать.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 21:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Еще этого держите User:187.189.187.130--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 21:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! Чтобы больше Вас не отвлекать и не мешать номинировался на админитратора. Очень прошу Вашей поддержки. Буду очень благодарен Вам!--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 22:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Я, как бюрократ, не голосую на выборах, я подвожу итоги.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Понимаю. Спасибо, что добавили в общее обьявление!--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 22:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Еще User:62.219.247.103 заблокировать нужно.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 11:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

User:46.222.147.242--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 12:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

User:188.64.207.221. Участник в описаниях своих правок пишет "פרו נאצי", что, как показал гугл-переводчик, означает "про-нацистский". Также он меняет дату рождения с 1881 года та 1880-ые, когда первое правильное. Организовал войну правок во многих элементах.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 17:49, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

С ним пусть лучше пока разбирается участник, которого он откатывал.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Здраствуйте! Можете удалить Q62024470? Спасибо!--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 14:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 14:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! У User:212.198.6.85 пусть и одна правка, но думаю, что можна сразу блокировать. У этого User:83.47.180.243 две правки, но вандальные.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 15:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! У этого User:193.51.215.2 некоторые персоналии ставали лошадьми.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 15:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Это динамический ІР. Сейчас вандалит с User:193.51.215.12--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 15:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! Есть еще этот User:23.162.64.34--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 15:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Вы знали, что Азербайджан это Колумбия? Нет?! Спросите User:190.242.116.170, он Вам расскажет.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 15:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

User:181.174.88.18 с одной правкой можна сразу.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 15:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

User:200.63.216.154. Я вижу, Вы сейчас заняты, поэтому @Aldnonymous:--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 16:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Template:Ping:Dimon2711 I am not Wikidata Administrator, please contact @Jianhui67: instead.AldNon^Ucallinme? 16:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

OK, sorry. Also please block User:195.244.160.101--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 16:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! Можете еще этого User:181.110.87.112 заблокировать?--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! Теперь прошу заблокировать её User:79.112.141.136.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

И еще его User:206.167.229.130, пожалуйста.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

И его User:176.14.36.59--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

User:173.213.90.79--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

User:144.172.141.22--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! Еще User:186.139.49.118 Special:Contributions/186.139.49.118--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 17:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Как видно, без меня уже обработали.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Возвращаюсь после небольшого перерыва. User:2806:104E:1D:3DF7:114C:BD36:AF01:2E42--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 21:32, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! Еще User:2806:105E:4:6470:D455:28AF:FF66:C9AB--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 19:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

User:190.53.237.233--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 21:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Тут уже поздно, и статью защищать пока не нужно.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Понял. Еще User:201.219.50.5--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 19:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

User:137.164.224.64--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 21:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

User:83.97.255.118--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC) User:2A02:2F0B:4103:4200:14A2:5D5F:E01F:CF1A--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC) User:2A02:908:1422:5BE0:C45F:BA11:FC06:118B--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC) Прошу User:‎35.8.221.202 взять во внимание. Любит создать идентификатор, а потом удалить его. Ничего конструктивного в этом не вижу, но и плохого тоже.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 18:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

User:190.68.152.54--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 19:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

User:85.192.71.53--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 19:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

User:90.168.41.16--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 19:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

User:208.94.131.74--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 19:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

User:138.99.224.98--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 19:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

User:2A02:908:1422:5BE0:C45F:BA11:FC06:118B Вы либо пропустили случайно, либо считаете его действия невандальными. Могу прокомментировать каждое. Первые два снизу очевидно вандальные, а третье - поменял слово без ошибки на слово с ней.--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 19:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

User:93.70.242.160 и User:93.39.141.85--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 19:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Простите, я не успеваю обрабатывать Ваши запросы. У меня, честно говоря, довольно много дел в проектах Викимедия, и я просто не могу каждый раз бросаться сюда и блокировать новый айпи с одной или двумя правками. Я думаю, Вам надо их выносить на форум администраторов.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Там реагируют спустя 3 часа и говорят, что уже поздно. Но раз у Вас настолько много дел, то буду писать Jianhui--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 11:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Merging request

Hello! Could you please help me merging Category:Births in Békéscsaba (Q18228690) and Category:People from Békéscsaba (Q8729425)? They are/were duplicates and the following two categories should be fixed on the Russian Wikipedia as well: ru:Категория:Родившиеся_в_Бекешчабе, ru:Категория:Персоналии:Бекешчаба. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 13:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

I am sorry but I do not edit Russian Wikipedia as a matter of principle. My apologies.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

There is no problem. Could you please help me to find a best place to post this request? I would be grateful. Bencemac (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

I would say the Project Chat. Also pinging @Infovarius:. You can also the Russian version of Project Chat, but it is not highly active.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:32, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Q60519556

Hi. Please delete this item. Because it was duplicate of Q19713464. I merged articles. Thanks.--NMW03 (talk) 21:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/InternetArchiveBot

Sorry about the rollback, accidentally clicked it. I did have some unanswered questions on the request. Besides that I reviewed some edits like [31] and these appear to be incorrect. The url to https://viaf.org/viaf/25168560/ works so the bot shouldn't add an archive url. Archive url should only be added when a link is broken. Multichill (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Ok, I remove the flag and reopen the request; pls make sure it is clear that the questions have not been answered.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Q61919900

Notability Q61919900 This entry had a link to a wikicommons entry and that satisfies the requirements--. You should have removed the OCID entry instead of deleting it. --Dprophitjr (talk) 13:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Actually it doesn't. Looked at the item and the person (you?) seems to be very not notable. Multichill (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Небольшая просьба

Почему-то у меня напрочь исчезла возможность добавлять в элементах ссылки на языковые разделы Википедии. То ли козни мне кто-то подстроил, то ли я глуп. Не важно. Если не трудно, добавьте, плиз, в Q617574 -- w:nl:Grote Ringlijn. --A.Savin (talk) 02:00, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Это баг, с вечера, как я понимаю, можно добавить только скриптом. Как только починят, я сразу добавлю.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done, готово--Ymblanter (talk) 10:29, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Avatar6

Здраствуйте! Я хотел бы обсудить блокировку участника Avatar6. Прошу его разблокировать и наложить фильтры. Он очень активный в укрвики и теперь каждая созданая ним статья не может быть подсоединена к элементу Викиданых. С уважением, Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 04:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Это надо обсуждать с заблокировавшим администратором.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:21, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Two users screwed this user_talk up

Two users, by their combined actions, messed the page up with the net effect of removal of thirteen threads. I hereby restore exactly one thread needed currently; IMHO the rest should be archived.

Note that I notified user:Infovarius—the author of the last bad edit—but he showed no care in any way. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I apparantly screwed it up back then.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Q43263711

Why Siiimple does not meet the notability policy? At least it can be described using french references like SIREN number - 810 223 503 - or registered trademark number - 4149554 -. Regards and thanks for your help!

Well, we have WD:N, and I do not see how it fits it there. Not every company having a registered trademark number is automatically notable.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:48, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:Honorary doctors of the University of Uppsala

Hi Ymblanter. This category Q7982119 exists in spanish wikipedia. Shouldn't be a corresponding item here in wikidata? Thank you. --Gerwoman (talk) 10:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, you are right, clearly my error. Restored.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Война правок

В Саудовской Аравии. Прошу обратить внимание. Раммон (talk) 08:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Atobot

Atobot. Прошу лишить его прав бота, ведь он бессрочно заблокирован. Как по мне, это достаточно очевидно, чтобы начинать новое обсуждение. Спасибо--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 20:45, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Нет, это какая-то техническая проблема. Если её решат, бот может работать дальше.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

New prop

Thanks for the bot status, could you check this prop proposal Wikidata:Property_proposal/pronunciation - I plan to use it from the start, and there seems to be a reasonable support for it. Thanks! --Yurik (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Да, я посмотрю.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо! --Yurik (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Там должно пройти ме меньше семи дней, что по моему времени будет ночью. (Европейским) утром, если не забуду, всё сделаю.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Да, я видел, пасиб, особой срочности нет )) --Yurik (talk) 21:08, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

User talk:OneLittleMouse

Please protege User talk:OneLittleMouse and block 188.32.110.178. Reason; crosswiki vandalism. 85.26.232.146 01:41, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Undelete

Hi, can you please undelete Q66799848, Q66800331, Q66800465, Q66804821, Q66806395, Q66806595, Q66806972, Q66808519, ‎Q66808654? These were on my watchlist, so I probably edited them, added more external sources and checked their notability. I will recheck the notability after undelete.--Jklamo (talk) 09:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I will undelete them, but first I need to delete all these creations (there are 17000 of them, and I do this automatically in batches; if I undelete smth now then the next deletion batch will likely delete them again). I am planning to finish today or tomorrow and then undelete selected items from the list. If you notice more of them, please let me know.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:25, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I noticed a few more - Q66797142, Q66800557, Q66801196 and Q66804989.--Jklamo (talk) 08:51, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 09:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Мелочь

Добрый день

Вы не могли бы грамотно оторвать вот здесь [32] русскую статюь от английской. Основания очевидны: русская статья про оптику, а а нглийская - про всё. Это даже по названиям видно.

Я такое не умею. Longbowman (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Сделал.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

database issue - contributions are gone

Hi Ymblanter! I noticed that a lot of my edits are gone. I experienced such a MediaWiki behaviour about ten years ago when Brion VIBBER (a main figure in MW development and friend) admitted thta such thinks happen?
example: all changes on my user talk page are gone.
Did you get notifications from other users? Best regards
no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיקע פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndike preferentsn ^{talk contribs} 18:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

No, I have never got such complaints, and, in fact, I see your edits in the history of your talk page. You only have six deleted edits in the log, none of them at your talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

I work very hard at wikidata. I am shure that I saved several edits on my talk page. I needed some links to work I did some years ago on VIAF interwiki linking etc. Please get in touch with people who should now what is going on. Since 2004 I used to be Gangleri specialized in mw fault finding. waiting for more details kindly

no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיקע פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndike preferentsn ^{talk contribs} 19:25, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

---

developers should be able to verify the presence and timestamps of all revision id in the database. you can not cheat this sequence by no means.

no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיקע פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndike preferentsn ^{talk contribs} 19:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

I do not have any particular connections to the developers, and I do not understand what the issue is. I believe all your edits are in the log.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Toghether with Nikerabbit I build the community of translators for the 300+ MW language interfaces. As far as I know, he is the chief developers at WMF California. I will ccontact him.

question: what chat support is used in these days for wikidata? you could reach me on FB at https://www.facebook.com/irelgnag

regards no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיקע פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndike preferentsn ^{talk contribs} 20:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

My apologies, but I do not think you are talking to me. You are clearly talking to yourself. I do not think you need my participation in this process.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Q73587300

Hi Ymblanter,

earlier today you deleted the Q73587300 page which I created two days ago with as argumentation that it didn't met the notability policy. This page was about my person and is intended to be used as a validation reference as author of scientific articles in an AI I'm currently working on.

It contained references to my ResearchGate profile and a reference to public gedcom data for birth information. These data makes imo the page falling under the notability policy point 2:

It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references.

Can you explain what your argumentation is to reject it anyways?

Kind regards,

Ronald Poell

Please publish the articles in the refereed journals, create items for these articles, and then it will be possible to create an item for you.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Ymblanter, my articles are published in ResearchGate as publication in refereed journals is against my policy of making data publicly available. If that is a condition sine qua non to be present in wikidata it is, imo, in contradiction with making open linked data widely available.

I've been working on networks similar to wikidata since 25+ years (see e.g. Semantic network technologies)and know how useful they can be, but constraining it in that way is a show stopper for me.

Regards,

RonaldPoell (talk) 20:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

I would object against inclusion any publication which has not been refereed. Sorry.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

If that is the community policy, it is regrettable and makes wikidata of much less interest for the AI I'm working on (see e.g. Gaia telling my residence history story). Regards RonaldPoell (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

174.255.198.233

Hi. Please check this IP's edits. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 03:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Too late, they are probably gone forever.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Два Ивана Устинова

Здравствуйте! Посмотрите, пожалуйста - не понимаю, как элемент о футболисте https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q1706585&oldid=1098073752 превратился в элемент о разведчике Q1706585. Я бы, может, и разобрался бы сам, но никак не пойму, как английская статья en:Ivan Ustinov, которая с 2012 года была в старом элементе, оказалась создана вчера. Возможно, одну удалили, а другую создали на её месте, но мне не хватает прав это увидеть. В общем, сейчас есть криво созданная участником Spokoyni смесь из двух разных человек Q1706585, плюс редирект Q56192500 и подвисшая теперь в воздухе статья о футболисте id:Ivan Ustinov. Этот же участник объединял недавно и другие элементы - думаю, надо проверить и там, как он это делал. --VLu (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Статью о футболисте в английской Википедии удалили 25 ноября, но почему это никак не отразилось в элементе Викиданных, я понять не могу. Участник, действительно, поступил довольно странно, в результате индонезийская статья вообще ни к чему на привязана.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Тогда ясно, спасибо. Поправил, как смог. --VLu (talk) 04:39, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Судя по реакции [33], понимание не гарантировано. --VLu (talk) 08:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Block needed

Hi. Can you please have a look at this request? Nobody takes care of it, and this guy keeps vandalizing the pages. Thanks. Csigabi (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

 Done, blocked for 3 days--Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I'd appreciate if you had a look on his edits in a couple of days again. Csigabi (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

I will most certainly forget, but if not I will have a look.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Arnepost

Hi. It's seems to me, that here is another sockpappet for once banned Maitsavend. --Derslek (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

I block this sock, but I am afraid there are too many to them, and I am not scalable. You probably need to go to stewards to look for a scalable solution.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

where can I ask for help to delete the entire contribution of these users, and all. and how to limit editing in Tatar.--Ilnur efende (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

I have a topi open at the Administrators Noticeboard. Sorry, I am travelling now, can not invest more time into the issue.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

"depicts Flores hawk-eagle"

Здравствуйте. Возможно, вы тоже обратили внимание на досадное недоразумение последних суток: некий участник не к месту добавляет "Flores hawk-eagle" в описание P180 (скорее всего, просто ошибся страницей) и в итоге, даром что правка была быстро отменена, на страницах наблюдения участников Викисклада везде, где кто-то добавляет в файл депиктс, в описании правки почему-то до сих пор настойчиво показывается "Created claim: depicts Flores hawk-eagle (P180)", даже у меня, хотя лично я у себя все браузерные кэши давно и многократно очистил.

Короче, очередной идиотизм в связи с печально известной кампанией по продвижению СД, и вчерашний случай на фоне всего остального в общем-то не стоил бы выеденного яйца, если бы не одно большое "но". Раз подобные правки столь настойчиво липнут к спискам наблюдения и это касается всех участников Викисклада, кто эти списки у себя поддерживает, а счёт им на тысячи, при этом элемент P180 на Викиданных может править кто угодно (хотя непонятно, нужно ли его править вообще), то это лишь вопрос времени, когда найдётся "особо креативный" вандал, который впишет туда что-нибудь похуже и оно появится у всех на несколько дней в списках наблюдения без возможности оперативно удалить. Посему прошу вас предпринять административные действия: закрыть этот элемент для редактирования полностью, или (если есть такая возможность) поставить какой-нибудь антифильтр, не позволяющий неадминам редактировать то самое утверждение. Спасибо. --A.Savin (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Я боюсь, тут ничего нельзя сделать, так как свойство как раз в основном редактируется неадминистраторами (добавляющими туда переводы), а полузащита не поможет, хотя как раз её я сейчас на всякий случай поставлю.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

На полузащите уже стоит. К счатью, подтверждённых тут участников, делающих такие правки, немного.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Плохо, что уважаемые "изобретатели" сделали проект таким уязвимым. У меня этот орёл так до сих пор и не улетучился (то исчезает, то снова появляется), и я не имею ни малейшего понятия, как от него избавиться... --A.Savin (talk) 13:07, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Это какое-то кэширование. Должно работать как с шаблонами, сначала сбросить кэш на Викиданных, потом на Коммонс. Сейчас попробую сделать нулевую правку, может, поможет.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Delete Spam Page and Block User

Q91833255 Delete this item and block User:Axymakofficial. The item does not meet notability requirements. User:Axymakofficial Doing self-promotion and spam on wikidata and other wiki.2405:205:140A:A22A:89FD:30AE:7626:4DF4 17:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

I blocked the user and deleted the Commons sitelink, but the item itself can not be deleted as soon as the Wikiquote span is live.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Delete Spam Page

Q91833255 Delete this Spam Page. The item does not meet notability requirements.2405:205:140A:A22A:C09A:C15F:44BB:314 06:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

It does not meet notability requirements because you deleted two sitelinks. Please restore and wait until the articles get deleted on the projects.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Argentinian politicians

Hi Ymblanter. I noticed that there is a group of IPs and new users introducing vandalismo to the items of some important Argentinian policians. You bloqued on Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, would you mind do the same for Q3754443 and Q452112. I did a report of one of the IP doing that vandalism here too. Thank you in advance. --Salvador alc (talk) 04:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

I protected Boudou for a month, but Kicellof was only vandalized once, it is too premature. The IP is likely a dynamic IP, which has a vandalism session and then disappeared forever.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Rollback rights

Dear Ymblanter, Im active on Wikimedia again, after a year working intensively IRL, and requested to get back rollback rights today, I hope you may be able to look into my request, make things easier with Huggle. Thanx. Dan Koehl (talk) 04:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

I see it has already been attended. Welcome back--Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, will try to do my very best! :) Dan Koehl (talk) 07:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Q23721853

My edit is actually correct. Motswana is the singular demonym for individual natives of Botswana, and Batswana is the plural. ミラP 19:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

The state is Botswana. I do not see how this is negociable.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

The item in question is about an individual person, so the singular demonym applies. ミラP 20:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

The English Wikipedia categoru is Botswana judges. May be you should try to move it first. It needs to go through a CfD.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

User Research - Looking for volunteers

Hey Ymblanter,

For a current research project we are looking for active community members in Wikipedia, Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons who are interested in filling out a survey and participating in an interview. The aim of the research is to identify opportunities for participation and access for new volunteers in the Wikimedia projects. For this purpose we would like to learn from the experiences of the already active community members and find out success factors for participation in the projects. Participation includes filling out a preliminary survey, a self-study and an interview.

If you are interested in participating, simply fill out this survey. The participants in the interviews will be selected on the basis of the answers in order to be able to consider as many different perspectives as possible.

All selected interview partners will receive a book or photo voucher of 25 euros as a thank you.

Feel free to forward this call to other people you think might share interesting experiences about Commons. If you have any questions you can of course contact me or check the project page :) On the Project Page you can also find more information.

Regards --Merle von Wittich (WMDE) (talk) 09:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry guys, no.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:52, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

User:Najstenjarvi

User:Najstenjarvi опять обходит блокировку и вандалит. Прошу его заблокировать и отменить все правки.--Damir (talk) 15:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Заблокировал, а по отмене правок, к сожалению, у меня нет волшебной палочки.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:35, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

@Bovlb:, this is again our vandal Tatar friens. Do you remember whether the filter you set up at the time had an expiration date? If yes it probably needs to be extended. This guy just comes and makes several hundred vandal edits in one go.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Noćni pogled is the same user active yesterday. All Tatar labels need to be reverted as well.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Ymblanter, возможно к кому нибудь можно обратиться, чтобы он отменил все правки этого участника и его клонов? Потому что как только мы исправляем данный участник за миг уничтожает наш вклад, скорее всего с помощью бота, так как за минуту делает очень много изменений. Пожалуйста помогите разрешить данную проблему, в Википедии такая волшебная палочка есть, думаю тут тоже.--Ilnur efende (talk) 20:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Надо бота искать, попробуйте тут: Wikidata:Bot requests--Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Adding this link, for future reference: Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Najstenjarvi--Ymblanter (talk) 10:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Q96623202 Delete this

spam page

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Карточка Викиданных не показывается

Создал категорию на Викискладе, как обычно, привязал её к элементу Викиданных, но на коммонсе до сих пор "no wikidata ID found", сколь ни очищай кэш и пр. Не знаете, почему? Спасибо. --A.Savin (talk) 12:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Очень странно, не должно такого быть. Иногда случаются проблемы с отставанием базы данных, но не на 12 же часов. Сейчас спрошу тут на форуме.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Оказывается. уже и без меня всё открыли: Wikidata:Project chat#interwiki links not appearing on Wikimedia Commons category--Ymblanter (talk) 13:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Железнодорожные станции

Всякие полустанки в Московской области, где только голый перрон и даже от дождя нигде не укрыться, не правильнее было бы объявлять как railway halt, а не railway station? Luitzen (talk) 10:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

По-моему, по-английски всё это railway station.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi there

I opened Q97657327 by mistake. Can you please delete it? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 01:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 06:05, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi again

Is it Catholic enough to merge Dora (Q987115) and Dora (Q96338865) under "unisex name"? That makes life easier to have "one Commons cat". My only Dora guy is now in a "female given name" cat in Commons; I'm afraid those girls in the cat may make him harm! :) Can you do this merge? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 17:05, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

No, I am not going to merge this. The question about merging names is currently discussed at the Project Chat, and there is no consensus that these names must be merged. You can praticipate in the discussion there.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Nema provlima. Give a try at Rifat Atun (Q28323647) and Rifat A Atun (Q73154859) if you so wish... --E4024 (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not wish. Why do not you do it yourself if you are sure the items should be merged?--Ymblanter (talk) 21:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Why do you not give me a button; I am bored of making items and when I wish to use them they do not show up until quite some time... Certainly after so much time and so many edits here this is strange to me. OTOH if I were not sure of it I would not have asked you the above. If you have noticed, the previous one was more of a question and this one a request. Take care. --E4024 (talk) 22:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed users must be able to merge items, and you are confirmed, no?--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @E4024: Just a tip, but you might want to use merge.js. You can enable it in your preferences. Best, Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 20:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

I'm also marking the Rifat Atun request as  Done, as I merged them. Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 20:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Concerning RefB

Dear Mr.,

I applied on 29 July 2020‎ to a bot flag for RefB. I already developed the source code and implemented it in Python. For nearly one month, I did not receive any answer. I already presented the bot in several meetings and it works. It is absolutely accurate that the bot can be ameliorated by adding several features to the code. However, this can be done after the acceptance of the bot. I ask if you take a look at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/RefB (WikiCred) and give me further advice.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 10:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Block me please

I am retiring and will no longer be active here. Please block me. Thanks Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 23:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

I am not doing self-requested blocks. Just stop opening the page.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Sure. I was actually considering retiring, but that's now not a possibility... Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 14:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Talkback

here --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Bureaucrat request: add User:MediaWiki message delivery to Account creators

Hi! Can you do us a favor and add User:MediaWiki message delivery to the Account creators group, so that it gets the noratelimit right? We just removed that right from the Bots group (T258354), but MassMessage should still be unaffected by the rate limit. --Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE) (talk) 12:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done, schon gut.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Request For Patrol Rights

Hello sir, my name is Karam, I have started patrol on the page of Wikidata, please see the patrol made by me-[34]And if you like my work If you want, please give me a patrol Rights, so that I can do as much patrol as possible on Wikidata.(Thanks)

-:Best Regards :- Karam06 (talk) 04:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your work, but we do not have patrol rights on Wikidata.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Sir, you can give me any rights that I can prevent from being vandalized on Wikidata, Sir please do not refuse, I would have got the rights if I had requested for the rights by doing five patrol on English Wikipedia, but I would work on English Wikipedia It does not feel good to do, if I do not have the right to patrol on Wikidata, then what is the use of patrolling, Sir, give me any right, if it is right for one month, which I can use to help Wikidata.(Thank you)

-Best Regards-:

Karam06 (talk) 07:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

We do not have the userright you are asking for. It technically does not exist.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Okay Sir, what rolebacker can you give me, this right will be on your wikidata, you are the manager and administrator, please give me this authority so that I can stop vandalism on Wikidata, I have read the vandalism regulation, if you If you cannot give me this right, please tell me that I cannot give you this right, Sir, believe me, I will uproot the barbarism from the winters. (Thanks)

-Best Regards:-

Karam06 (talk) 09:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not think you have enough experience for the rollbacker flag.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Sir, you talk about how you will get the role of rollbacker, how many edits will have to be made, please you become my mentor and show me the way. (Thanks)

-:Best Regards-: Karam06 (talk) 11:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

No, I can not do that.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

English labels

Oh, hi.

I have looked at your recent label reverts and reviewed Help:Label, and I cannot figure out any valid rationale that you might be following that would explain the transnational name Kiev Okruha for Kyiv Okruha (Q4220224) As far as I can tell this string of letters is only recorded a single time in all of Google Books and Scholar (capitalized Kiev okruha). If we were to follow the advice of item 3 in Help:Label#Items without pages on Wikimedia sites, “language that the item was first named in,” it would be Kyivska okruha, since Ukrainian was the primary language of government in the Ukrainian SSR of the 1920s. —Michael Z. 2020-11-06 19:00 z 19:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, this must be a typo, I meant Kyiv/Kiev Okruha. I will have a look now.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

I see now what you mean. Kyivska Okruha is not used either. Probably we need to wait until someone creates a Wikipedia article (presumably me next year), it will go through a RM, and then some standard naming is going to be established.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

(Oops, I made a typo there.)

Well okay, but there is no basis for your changing the label from Kyiv Okruha to Kiev Okruha. If we implement the Wikidata guideline to the letter, name it Kyivska okruha, or with some interpretation Kyiv okruh. Or are you implying that the anticipated result of an open RFC at w:en:talk:Kyiv and a speculative future article title should lead us to disregard Wikidata’s own guideline? —Michael Z. 2020-11-06 19:47 z 19:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

We both know that your application of this guideline is a stretch. And we also both know why you are here, and why you have made today the edits which you made.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

I see. No assuming good faith? I want to understand the naming rationale in Wikidata, where I’m relatively new. You revert me, but refuse explain your thought process or application of the guideline, instead wave me off with an “eff you.” Not a good start. I guess I just keep editing to find out what your boundaries are and whether others here have the same views? —Michael Z. 2020-11-06 20:00 z 20:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

The big picture is that Wikidata generally follows Wikipedia (if we are talking about English labels, then the English Wikipedia). Though there could be deviations of course, because people often come here because they are unhappy with how Wikipedia discussions go (and I do not even mean Ukrainian labels now, there are outrageous examples like Arab-Israeli or Armenian-Azerbaijani), or for other reasons. We do not really have elementary mechanisms here for discussing these names / labels - for example, there are no meaningful edit summaries (well, there are some, but they are difficult to fins and very rarely used), and we do not have things like RM - one needs to try discussing at the talk page (which is usually hopeless, because most of these are not watched), or go to the Project Chat - but it usually only makes sense if one talks about a large number of similar names.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Q1483612

Здравствуйте. А что это за нововведение - удалять ссылки на викисловарь? Dmidek (talk) 08:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Я, честно говоря, не знаю, спросите у него. Он явно что-то имеет в виду.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Q98822184

Здравствуйте, Ярослав! Буду очень благодарна за вашу помощь в восстановлении этой wikidata. Я её создала на этапе публикации статьи в инкубаторе и редактировала её, в соответствии с рекомендациями и на данный момент, после апрува, она была перенесена в ОП. Возможно, в связи с тем, что вы тогда её не увидели в ОП, могло ложно показаться, что это self-promote. Так как, это моя вторая статья только, я не знала, что wikidata создают уже после аппрува статьи и если у вас есть какие-либо рекомендации, я внесу необходимые правки. И простите за столь долгий ответ, к сожалению не было возможности ответить ранее в связи с болезнью. Ценю ваше время и заранее спасибо! - Tio10 (talk) 03:07, 15 Ноября 2020 (UTC)

Доброе утро. Восстановил и добавил ссылку на статью.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Спасибо огромное за помощь! Отличного дня вам! - Tio10 (talk) 14:07, 14 Ноября 2020 (UTC)

"по направлению к" для железнодорожных о.п.

Ярослав, добрый день! Подскажите, пожалуйста, чем вы руководствуетесь, когда выбираете названия конечных станций в утверждении "по направлению к"?
И второй момент - вы не думали об архивации этой страницы? Она уже стала очень тяжелой.
Спасибо! Michgrig (talk) 21:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Добрый день. Это узловые станции. Сколько я помню, в перечне станций они же совпадают с границами участков, но там не всегода всё быстро обновляется.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

В каком именно перечне станций? Michgrig (talk) 23:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Тарифные расстояния.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)