Wikidata:Property proposal/Phonographic copyright
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
phonographic copyright
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
| Description | person or organization that holds the phonographic copyright |
|---|---|
| Represents | ℗ phonographic copyright (Q64490964) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | album (Q482994), single (Q134556) |
| Example 1 | Ingen kan slå (Boten Anna) (Q120186837)Phonographic copyrightIconic Music Sweden AB (Q120186959) |
| Example 2 | Fest i hela huset (Q120187094)Phonographic copyrightWarner Music Sweden AB (Q111358417) |
| Example 3 | Add third example |
| Planned use | putting value to music releases |
Motivation
[edit]Property for music releases. Eurohunter (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- How is this different from copyright holder (P3931)? Multichill (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- copyright ≠ phonographic copyright, they represented two distinct rights and their respective rights holders will typically (but not always) be different entities. In my opinion it would be really useful to separate the two (© and ℗) to help with querying in the music field and to avoid conflation. Moebeus (talk) 07:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
@Moebeus:--Trade (talk) 01:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Trade (talk) 01:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)- Support, an important property for music.--Arbnos (talk) 13:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Oppose As proposed. It's unclear why this is supposed to be a ID/identifier. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 21:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: It has item datatype, so I don't see where it was said to be supposed to be a ID/identifier? ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- The proposed property description calls it an identifier. It also fails to explain what "Phonographic Copyright" happens to be. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 22:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Multichill, ArthurPSmith:, would you like to give your opinion? Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 05:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- The proposed property description calls it an identifier. It also fails to explain what "Phonographic Copyright" happens to be. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 22:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: It has item datatype, so I don't see where it was said to be supposed to be a ID/identifier? ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Eurohunter: Please write a better (English) description, we have some sticklers here for good descriptions. ArthurPSmith (talk) 01:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith: It works the same way as record label (P264) which is different for phonographic copyright. Eurohunter (talk) 19:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Eurohunter: The word "identifier" in the description in your proposal template here is wrong - please change it. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith:
Done Eurohunter (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- That wasn't a very useful change. I modified it some more, is this accurate for what you are trying to do here? ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith: I didn't see the answer, but it looks good. Eurohunter (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- That wasn't a very useful change. I modified it some more, is this accurate for what you are trying to do here? ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith:
- @Eurohunter: The word "identifier" in the description in your proposal template here is wrong - please change it. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith: It works the same way as record label (P264) which is different for phonographic copyright. Eurohunter (talk) 19:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Eurohunter, Trade, Arbnos, ChristianKl, Multichill, ArthurPSmith: Done as phonographic copyright (P12456) Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
